Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Does DNSSEC require nettle and gmp, or nettle with gmp?

2014-04-09 Thread /dev/rob0
On Tue, Apr 01, 2014 at 11:54:28AM -0500, I wrote: ^^ On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 07:08:44PM -0400, Alex Xu wrote: On 25/03/14 07:03 PM, sven falempin wrote: my concern of nettle vs openssl is the amount of review and testing nettle did get compared to something more widely(!)

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Does DNSSEC require nettle and gmp, or nettle with gmp?

2014-04-09 Thread Dave Taht
On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 6:24 AM, /dev/rob0 r...@gmx.co.uk wrote: On Tue, Apr 01, 2014 at 11:54:28AM -0500, I wrote: ^^ On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 07:08:44PM -0400, Alex Xu wrote: On 25/03/14 07:03 PM, sven falempin wrote: my concern of nettle vs openssl is the amount of review and

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Does DNSSEC require nettle and gmp, or nettle with gmp?

2014-04-09 Thread Olaf Westrik
Simon, Don't underestimate the contribution of all the people who take responsibility for the software that runs as root, or exposed to the net, on your machines. It's something I have nightmares about. I do hope that is not true and that you sleep well. So much better to be rested and clear

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Announce: dnsmasq-2.69

2014-04-09 Thread Dave Reisner
On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 09:36:08PM +0100, Simon Kelley wrote: On 09/04/14 21:32, Dave Reisner wrote: On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 09:13:33PM +0100, Simon Kelley wrote: Dnsmasq-2.69 is here. http://www.thekelleys.org.uk/dnsmasq/dnsmasq-2.69.tar.gz and (new) a signature