Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Two routers, two dnsmasq instances, can they sync?

I was going to implement this a year ago, but unfortunately stuck in establishing IP connectivity between the subnets. Providing you have IP connectivity (VPN I assume), you can pull lease file from one router to another, convert it to 'hosts' file (don't forget to compare lease times in

[Dnsmasq-discuss] Slow DNSMasq with > 100, 000 entries in additional addresses file

Using DNSMasq 2.76 on the Openwrt platform with a raspberry pi 3 like device for home networking 1GB RAM, dual core 1 GHZ processor). Additionally I'm using the the adblock set of scripts found @ (https://github.com/openwrt/packages/tree/master/net/adblock/files) to block malware and porn

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Sequential IP doesn't look for unused IPs

Hi Alec, A bit disagree on that, at up-to-time Asus routers use hashed mac allocations, not sequential. Older ones – did sequential allocation with reuse of expired IP from the very start (original udhcpd behavior), and in my practice, it rose issues when the same ip was allocated to

[Dnsmasq-discuss] IPv6 on OpenWRT

Hi all, I am using dnsmasq on OpenWRT and I have configured the DHCPv6 server and it is working well with the clients connected to the router. However, the DNS is not working; IPv6 requests are not successful. The clients are given the router’s IP for DNS, like they are with IPv4 but the DNS is

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Sequential IP doesn't look for unused IPs

Thank you for your reply. It was just really to make it like every other router I’ve used. It’s not a “problem” as such. — Alec Robertson On 25 December 2016 at 11:03:35, Albert ARIBAUD (albert.arib...@free.fr) wrote: (TL;DR: skip to last paragraph of my reply) Hi Alec, Le Sat, 24 Dec 2016

[Dnsmasq-discuss] Two routers, two dnsmasq instances, can they sync?

I have two OpenWRT routers which are physically far apart. One serves 192.168.2, the other serves 192.168.1 and they route between each other. I'd prefer it if rt1 and rt2 could each manage dhcp on their respective subnets but I'd like them to have a common view of the internal DNS. Is this

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Windows ipv6 hostname

On Monday 26 December 2016 14:50:41 Markus Hartung wrote: > >For dhcpv6 I have own dnsmasq patches which assign ipv6 address > >bases on > >mac address... > > That could be interesting with such patch. Is there any reason it > haven't been accepted? See discussion:

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Windows ipv6 hostname

Hello, On 26 December 2016 10:29:26 GMT+01:00, "Pali Rohár" wrote: >On Friday 23 December 2016 10:39:20 Markus Hartung wrote: >> Is there a way to flush the lease database in dnsmasq? I have tried >> removing the line in /var/lib/misc/dnsmasq.leases and restart dnsmasq >>

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Windows ipv6 hostname

On Friday 23 December 2016 10:39:20 Markus Hartung wrote: > Is there a way to flush the lease database in dnsmasq? I have tried > removing the line in /var/lib/misc/dnsmasq.leases and restart dnsmasq > but my laptop still gets the same IP-address. Or is it that dnsmasq > uses the mac-address to