Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] [PATCH] Nack requests for unknown leases.

> What I did to fix it was to send a NACK to the initial DHCP request, > which luckily convinced the ISC DHCP client to stop asking for the > same IP address in the following DHCP discovery. However, NACK will > not quarantee all DHCP clients will do the same, so the case where > DHCP discovery

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] [PATCH] Nack requests for unknown leases.

On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 3:43 PM, wrote: > On 04/24/2017 05:16 AM, Alin Năstac wrote: >> >> On Sun, Apr 23, 2017 at 5:46 PM, Simon Kelley >> wrote: >>> >>> When the client sends the discovery packet, dnsmasq will notice that the >>> requested address

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] [PATCH] Nack requests for unknown leases.

On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 10:51 PM, Simon Kelley wrote: > On 24/04/17 10:16, Alin Năstac wrote: >> On Sun, Apr 23, 2017 at 5:46 PM, Simon Kelley >> wrote: >>> On 20/04/17 10:34, Alin Nastac wrote: Hosts that migrate from one network to

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] [PATCH] Nack requests for unknown leases.

On 25/04/2017 08:08, Alin Năstac wrote: > I'm talking about second case, the "static" one. The use case is this: > 1) Client A using ISC DHCP client gets a lease from a different LAN called X > 2) Client A gets disconnected from LAN X and connected to LAN Y where > dnsmasq DHCP server runs in a

[Dnsmasq-discuss] use-host-decl-names on; option

Hi, I use dnsmasq for diskless clients for years without problems. Now I have an another type of diskless system where I need to be sure that the use-host-decl-names is set to on. On my understanding in dnsmasq this is the default case but I need to be sure. I tried to set it in my config with: