Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Behavior on DHCP denied

2023-04-18 Thread Geert Stappers
On Tue, Apr 18, 2023 at 08:24:17PM +0100, Simon Kelley wrote: > On 18/04/2023 16:35, 0zl wrote: > > Hello, > > > > This is an issue I've experienced > > with ESP8266 and proxy ARP on my WiFi network. Please confirm that it is proxy ARP as in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proxy_ARP > > I was

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Behavior on DHCP denied

2023-04-18 Thread Simon Kelley
On 18/04/2023 16:35, 0zl wrote: Hello, This is an issue I've experienced with ESP8266 and proxy ARP on my WiFi network. I was able to work around it by assigning the devices an infinite lease, however I think dnsmasq's behavior is undesirable. In short, ESP8266 is on a network with proxy

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Behavior on DHCP denied

2023-04-18 Thread 0zl
On 4/18/23 22:51, Geert Stappers wrote: On Tue, Apr 18, 2023 at 08:24:17PM +0100, Simon Kelley wrote: On 18/04/2023 16:35, 0zl wrote: Hello, This is an issue I've experienced with ESP8266 and proxy ARP on my WiFi network. Please confirm that it is proxy ARP as in

[Dnsmasq-discuss] Behavior on DHCP denied

2023-04-18 Thread 0zl
Hello, This is an issue I've experienced with ESP8266 and proxy ARP on my WiFi network. I was able to work around it by assigning the devices an infinite lease, however I think dnsmasq's behavior is undesirable. In short, ESP8266 is on a network with proxy ARP setup; getting the initial

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Behavior on DHCP denied

2023-04-18 Thread Geert Stappers
On Wed, Apr 19, 2023 at 03:16:37AM +0300, 0zl wrote: > On 4/18/23 22:51, Geert Stappers wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 18, 2023 at 08:24:17PM +0100, Simon Kelley wrote: > > > On 18/04/2023 16:35, 0zl wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > > > > > This is an issue I've experienced > > > > with ESP8266 and proxy

[Dnsmasq-discuss] Confusion about "no address range available for DHCPv6 request via ..."

2023-04-18 Thread Daniel Farina
Hello everyone, I have been trying to set up an IPv6-only network for a virtual machine with route advertisements and DHCP configuration. I've had some success, but I have a question. I have a dnsmasq.conf that looks like this, to delegate a /80 chunk of a /64 network to a virtual machine: