Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] configurable stop-dns-rebind?

2010-05-11 Thread clemens fischer
Simon Kelley wrote: > OK, try test25, in the usual place. I called the option > --rebind-domain-ok but otherwise it's as Clemens describes. What can I say? It just works! I have "stop-dns-rebind" on and three dnsbl's configured: --rebind-domain-ok=/zen.spamhaus.org/ --rebind-domain-ok=

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] configurable stop-dns-rebind?

2010-05-11 Thread Simon Kelley
clemens fischer wrote: > /dev/rob0 wrote: > >> I would suggest that "RBL" is not the proper term, it is "DNSBL". >> "RBL" refers specifically to the MAPS RBL. > > Good idea. > >> I've never had the issue, because I don't use --stop-dns-rebind. >> I have VPN-linked RFC 1918 netblocks that I want

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Strange problem

2010-05-11 Thread clemens fischer
Don Muller wrote: (can you turn off HTML emails to lists, please?) > Never mind. I did some further testing and I do not think it's > a dnsmasq issue. I think it's a WINS issue. On the 509 the resolve > order is wins bcast host. So I stopped and started smb (samba) on the > 639 and I could then p

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] configurable stop-dns-rebind?

2010-05-11 Thread clemens fischer
/dev/rob0 wrote: > I would suggest that "RBL" is not the proper term, it is "DNSBL". > "RBL" refers specifically to the MAPS RBL. Good idea. > I've never had the issue, because I don't use --stop-dns-rebind. > I have VPN-linked RFC 1918 netblocks that I want to resolve on the > other ends of th

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] configurable stop-dns-rebind?

2010-05-11 Thread /dev/rob0
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 01:02:30AM +0200, clemens fischer wrote: > "rbl-domain" is the better way. Dnsmasq would still need to > add to the internal structure keeping "server" info indicating > that the "stop-dns-rebind" is disabled for the "rbl-domain"s. I would suggest that "RBL" is not the pro

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Strange problem

2010-05-11 Thread Don Muller
Never mind. I did some further testing and I do not think it's a dnsmasq issue. I think it's a WINS issue. On the 509 the resolve order is wins bcast host. So I stopped and started smb (samba) on the 639 and I could then ping the 639 from the 509 with proper resolution. It looks like when it gets i

[Dnsmasq-discuss] Strange problem

2010-05-11 Thread Don Muller
I am having a strange problem that I think might be related to dnssmasq. Sorry for the length of this but you need the background. I have a nas (QNAP TS-509) that is my main server. It runs linux and a number of apps one of which is dnsmasq. I use the dns and dhcp features. I have another nas (

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] configurable stop-dns-rebind?

2010-05-11 Thread clemens fischer
Simon Kelley wrote: > clemens fischer wrote: > >> I have one little nit with option "stop-dns-rebind": it breaks >> the RBL's needed to defend against spam. If only it could be a >> sub-option to the "server" option to select which servers are allowed >> to receive answers in the 127/8 or some ot