On Sat, 2013-02-09 at 11:01 -0500, Gene Czarcinski wrote:
> On 02/08/2013 05:11 PM, Dan Williams wrote:
> > On Fri, 2013-02-08 at 11:34 -0500, Gene Czarcinski wrote:
> >> On 02/08/2013 10:39 AM, Gene Czarcinski wrote:
> >>> On 02/08/2013 10:17 AM, Simon Kelley wrote:
> On 07/02/13 21:27, Gene
On Sat, 2013-02-09 at 12:02 -0500, Gene Czarcinski wrote:
> On 02/09/2013 11:01 AM, Gene Czarcinski wrote:
> > I need to look at the new code in NetworkManager to see what is being
> > done.
> There is a testing candidate update out for NetworkManager and
> networt-manager-applet (0.9.7.997) whic
On 10/02/2013 15:49, Vladislav Grishenko wrote:
> Hi, Kevin
> probably it's because while dnsmasq upgrading, tomato-specific patches
> were rollbacked/missed, one of them includes custom lease expiration
> time. if you're interested, take a look at dnsmasq changes in recent
> asuswrt fws. thay have
On 10/02/13 14:32, Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant wrote:
Hi All,
Slightly long story and I'm *very* new to all this so please go easy :-)
I'm a 'Tomato' firmware router user and recently been getting into IPv6
- discovered a known bug whereby dnsmasq wasn't setting the 'on-link'
bit in the IPv6 RAs.
Hi All,
Slightly long story and I'm *very* new to all this so please go easy :-)
I'm a 'Tomato' firmware router user and recently been getting into IPv6
- discovered a known bug whereby dnsmasq wasn't setting the 'on-link'
bit in the IPv6 RAs. Having not played with linux much before I then
set
