Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] IPv6 constructor option - confused!

2013-05-02 Thread Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant
On 02/05/2013 17:00, Simon Kelley wrote: > > It is how I expected it to work, exactly. > > DHCP-PD client gets prefix, and assigns ::1 to LAN interface. > > dnsmasq gives addresses between > > ::2 and :: > > to clients on the LAN. > Which (contrived case) isn't ideal if for some reason the DHCP-PD

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] IPv6 constructor option - confused!

2013-05-02 Thread Simon Kelley
On 02/05/13 13:02, Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant wrote: On 02/05/2013 09:36, Simon Kelley wrote: On 01/05/13 16:26, Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant wrote: Hi Simon, I find myself confused by the use of the constructor option for building DHCPv6 address ranges. edited dnsmasq.conf file: enable-ra dhcp-rang

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] IPv6 constructor option - confused!

2013-05-02 Thread Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant
On 02/05/2013 13:09, Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant wrote: > > Ahhh! Right, a clue: Changing > > enable-ra > dhcp-range=tag:br0,::100, :::::, constructor:br0, > ra-names, 12h > > to > > enable-ra > dhcp-range=::100, :::::, constructor:br0, ra-names, 12h > > makes it work

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] IPv6 constructor option - confused!

2013-05-02 Thread Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant
On 02/05/2013 13:02, Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant wrote: > Specifying the router's LAN IPv6 address as the start of the range was > not how I anticipated this option to work. And I don't think you do > either based upon your above description. So is this an oversight or > some tomato based wierdness...e

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] IPv6 constructor option - confused!

2013-05-02 Thread Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant
On 02/05/2013 09:36, Simon Kelley wrote: > On 01/05/13 16:26, Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant wrote: >> Hi Simon, >> >> I find myself confused by the use of the constructor option for building >> DHCPv6 address ranges. >> >> edited dnsmasq.conf file: >> >> enable-ra >> dhcp-range=tag:br0,::1, ::, const

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Router advertisement sent to wrong interface

2013-05-02 Thread Simon Kelley
On 02/05/13 00:56, Sjors Gielen wrote: Hi all, A while ago I replaced radvd with dnsmasq for SLAAC. It's been working smoothly ever since I set it up. Today, I had to reboot my router and something unintended happened: it sent out a router advertisement on the external interface. Now, people in

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] IPv6 constructor option - confused!

2013-05-02 Thread Simon Kelley
On 01/05/13 16:26, Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant wrote: Hi Simon, I find myself confused by the use of the constructor option for building DHCPv6 address ranges. edited dnsmasq.conf file: enable-ra dhcp-range=tag:br0,::1, ::, constructor:br0, ra-names, 12h Now on my Tomato based router this pic

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Android dnsmasq

2013-05-02 Thread Simon Kelley
On 01/05/13 11:38, Tom wrote: Hi All, Is the enable-ra option on Android tested (4.xx). Nothing is tested in Android 4.xx, at least by me. The Android-specific stuff in the distribution came originally from the Android distro around 2.2. As far as I know, Android hasn't updated anything, and i

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] How to run dnsmasq as RA with A bit and O bit but without dhcpv6

2013-05-02 Thread Xu He Jie
Simon, many thanks for your reply! Your reply resolve all my problem! On 2013年04月30日 17:32, Simon Kelley wrote: On 28/04/13 10:53, Xu He Jie wrote: Hi, folks I am trying to run RA and stateless dhcpv6 in separeted host. I have tried: dnsmasq --interface l3outer -k -d --dhcp-range=2001:0:0:1::