Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] DhcpV6 how to send prefixlen and default route (dnsmasq: to exclusive) (dnsmasq: to exclusive)

2013-11-25 Thread Simon Kelley
On 24/11/13 16:59, dnsmasq.bertra...@dfgh.net wrote: Le 23/11/2013 23:01, dnsmasq.bertra...@dfgh.net a écrit : Le 23/11/2013 15:06, dnsmasq.bertra...@dfgh.net a écrit : Hello, Alwas some problems with my /97 prefix ... on the client side dhclient say the prefix is /64 dhclient hardcode the

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] DhcpV6 how to send prefixlen and default route

2013-11-25 Thread Roy Marples
On 23/11/2013 14:06, dnsmasq.bertra...@dfgh.net wrote: Hello, Alwas some problems with my /97 prefix ... on the client side dhclient say the prefix is /64 the router advertissement is ok with ridsc6 i see that i have /97 prefix in dhcp no option for prefixlen seems possible Is a trick

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] DhcpV6 how to send prefixlen and default route

2013-11-25 Thread Simon Kelley
On 25/11/13 11:57, Roy Marples wrote: On 23/11/2013 14:06, dnsmasq.bertra...@dfgh.net wrote: Hello, Alwas some problems with my /97 prefix ... on the client side dhclient say the prefix is /64 the router advertissement is ok with ridsc6 i see that i have /97 prefix in dhcp no option for

[Dnsmasq-discuss] CNAME related segfault in v2.67 onwards

2013-11-25 Thread Andrew Childs
Hi, I recently upgraded to v2.67 (on FreeBSD, built with “gmake clean all-i18n CFLAGS=-g) and found dnsmasq was frequently crashing when queried for a particular cname with the following stack trace: Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. 0x00403804 in cache_unlink

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] CNAME related segfault in v2.67 onwards

2013-11-25 Thread Simon Kelley
Many thanks for the thorough analysis. My understanding is that this is fixed in http://thekelleys.org.uk/gitweb/?p=dnsmasq.git;a=commit;h=7b174c250df2bc97b503fd03b9e473998676b1a6 and therefore in 2.68test1 onwards. The Subject of your email implies that's not true, or have I misunderstood?

[Dnsmasq-discuss] Diagnosing total lack of DNS after reboot of dnsmasq machine

2013-11-25 Thread Chris Green
I run dnsmasq on a Acer Revo running xubuntu 12.10, it's a fairly standard configuration, the only significant customisations are:- address=/www.google-analytics.com/127.0.0.1 address=/ssl.google-analytics.com/127.0.0.1 address=/static.doubleclick.net/127.0.0.1

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] CNAME related segfault in v2.67 onwards

2013-11-25 Thread Simon Kelley
On 25/11/13 18:51, Andrew Childs wrote: I’m still seeing this crash in v2.68rc2. There’s a check in cache_find_by_name (cache.c:561) that doesn’t consider F_CONFIG. Here’s a full backtrace from v2.68rc2: You're an official Hero of the Revolution for spotting this before the 2.68 release.

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] CNAME related segfault in v2.67 onwards

2013-11-25 Thread Andrew Childs
On 26/11/2013, at 10:24 am, Simon Kelley si...@thekelleys.org.uk wrote: You're an official Hero of the Revolution for spotting this before the 2.68 release. Many thanks. Glad I happened to upgrade when I did. Thanks for the quick fix :) Andrew smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic