On 21/02/14 09:07, Nikita N. wrote:
All the clients are quite common, and in use all around the world, if
there was a general problem with this, we'd probably have heard about it
by now.
Hi, well you are hearing it now :)
True, but it's not clear what to do about it. The modification to
On 22/02/14 22:58, Tamas Papp wrote:
On 02/20/2014 06:12 PM, Simon Kelley wrote:
On 19/02/14 23:03, Tamas Papp wrote:
hi All,
Feb 19 23:49:48 workhorse dnsmasq-dhcp[6678]: DHCPINFORM(eth-clients)
10.0.1.233 70:54:d2:1b:18:59
Feb 19 23:49:48 workhorse dnsmasq-dhcp[6678]:
On 23/02/14 00:35, klondike wrote:
Hi guys,
This is yet another dnsmasq question, involving the Gothemburg Hackerspace.
After getting localised queries to work (thanks a lot for the hint) I'm
trying to get networks reosanably isolated whilst still using (if
possible) the same daemon.
El 24/02/14 12:58, Simon Kelley escribió:
On 23/02/14 00:35, klondike wrote:
Hi guys,
This is yet another dnsmasq question, involving the Gothemburg Hackerspace.
After getting localised queries to work (thanks a lot for the hint) I'm
trying to get networks reosanably isolated whilst still
I just pushed out a new 2.69 test release, which completes the DNSSEC
feature-set with NSEC3 secure denial of existence. Thanks go to Messrs
Hunt, Gieben and Mekking for guiding me through that swamp.
If you're interested in DNSSEC, please give this a spin.
On 02/24/2014 12:54 PM, Simon Kelley wrote:
What is the reason they do this?
It doesn't make sense to me. I mean if they are just chatting, but don't
do anything, then no reason.
The clients are not using DHCP to get IP addreses (at least not using
DHCPINFORM they might have get a DHCP
