On 24/03/14 23:29, sven falempin wrote:
Yes it logs better when i launch with --dnssec-check-unsigned
can i put these in the configuration file like bogus-priv
:
Yes, the set of --long-option and config-file keywords is identical,
apart from a few which make no sense, like --version.
did you also compile with dhcpv6 support enabled?
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 7:33 AM, Tomas Hozza tho...@redhat.com wrote:
- Original Message -
On 24/03/14 13:51, Tomas Hozza wrote:
Hi.
I did a version diff scan between 2.68 and 2.69rc1 version.
From my point of view there is one
Hello
Is it possible to enable the resolution of hostname given to the dhcp
server by clients ?
Best regards.
--
-
() ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail
/\
I'm pretty sure dnsmasq does this by default. Are you using the DHCP server
built into dnsmasq? If so, are you sure all the clients are actually
sending the hostname along with their lease requests?
In my case, I noticed that not all clients were doing it by default --
dhclient may or may not need
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 25/03/14 14:43, Alex Xu wrote:
I'm writing the Gentoo ebuild for dnsmasq 2.69rc1
(https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=504154), and I was
wondering if dnsmasq requires nettle and gmp, or actually
nettle[gmp].
The latter builds nettle
On Mar 25, 2014, at 4:52 PM, Simon Kelley wrote:
On 25/03/14 21:25, Lonnie Abelbeck wrote:
Is the decision to not support OpenSSL shared libraries a final decision, or
is there a chance you may reconsider ?
The very early DNSSEC code used openSSL, so it's possible. The reason
for
