Is there a technique/filter I can apply so that dnsmasq will ONLY respond
to direct relay requests? (as opposed to local LAN broadcast requests?)
I'd like to test using dnsmasq in my environment, but don't want it to
conflict with another DHCP server running on the current LAN.
Cheers,
Joel
On 22/09/15 21:37, Joel Krauska wrote:
> Is there a technique/filter I can apply so that dnsmasq will ONLY respond
> to direct relay requests? (as opposed to local LAN broadcast requests?)
>
> I'd like to test using dnsmasq in my environment, but don't want it to
> conflict with another DHCP
Hi!
Just want to verify that there is no change regarding the 'strict-order'
option.
It's still considered broken, and not recommended for use?
Last note on this I found on the list was in 2009.
BR
/Thomas
___
Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list
The strict-order option does what it's documented to do, as far as I know.
If what you're actually asking is "does the strict-order option still
not allow me to give priority to a nameserver which has a different idea
of the DNS to the secondary nameserver(s)" then the answer to that is
that it
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 04/09/15 02:20, Sivabalakrishnan M wrote:
> Hi Simon,
>
> I would like to understand how tags (setting tags, matching tags
> for dhcp-range, dhcp-option, dhcp-match) work. Is there any
> documentation I can refer? Please let me know.
>
> Or we
