-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256


On 30/09/15 02:02, Hongyi Zhao wrote:
> 2015-09-30 5:04 GMT+08:00 Simon Kelley <si...@thekelleys.org.uk>:
>> On 27/09/15 04:44, Hongyi Zhao wrote:
>>> 2015-09-27 4:53 GMT+08:00 Simon Kelley
>>> <si...@thekelleys.org.uk>:
>>>> You can't put non-standard ports in a resolv-file, the format
>>>> of those files does not include ports.
>>>> 
>>>> It is possible to put a non-standard port in dnsmasq
>>>> configuration files using
>>>> 
>>>> server=server1#port1
>>>> 
>>>> So simply make your file look like
>>>> 
>>>> server=server1#port1 server=server2#port2 
>>>> server=server3#port3 server=server4#port4
>>>> 
>>>> call it /path/to/servers.dnsmasq
>>>> 
>>>> and tell dnsmasq to read it as a dnsmasq configuration file.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> sudo dnsmasq -d -p 5353 -C /path/to/servers.dnsmasq
>>>> --all-servers
>>> 
>>> According to the help of dnsmasq, it seems that the more
>>> appriate method should be using the following option to invoke
>>> the above configuration file:
>>> 
>>> --servers-file=<path>               Specify path to file with 
>>> server= options
>>> 
>>> sudo dnsmasq -d -p 5353 --servers-file=/path/to/servers.dnsmasq
>>> --all-servers
>> 
>> Yes, that's a good way to do it.
>> 
>>> 
>>> In addition, I want to know another thing: how to control the
>>> shortest time with which I wait for the responding from these
>>> upstream dns servers.  I mean: when using `--all-servers'
>>> option, the dnsmasq will query all of these dns servers
>>> parallely and I want to use the most firstly query returned to
>>> me and then throttle the remail query for the spefific domain
>>> name.  Is this possiable?
>> 
>> The first answer returned will be the one used. I don't
>> understand the second part of your question, sorry. Could you
>> explain another way what you want to do?
> 
> Sorry for my poor english.
> 
> Let me describe it as follows:
> 
> Just as you have told me: the first answer returned will be the one
> used.
> 
> But, after the  the first answer returned, there still will be
> other query restults returned subsequently due to the parallelly
> query done by `all-servers' option.  So, how the dnsmasq deal with
> the remain ones?  Does it simply discard the remainly returned
> results?

Yes. That's exactly what it does.


Cheers,

Simon.

> 
> Regards
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Cheers,
>> 
>> Simon.
>> 
>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> That should do the trick.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> 
>>>> Simon.
>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On 24/09/15 02:56, Hongyi Zhao wrote:
>>>>> Hi Simon,
>>>>> 
>>>>> I have server upstream dns servers with non-standard ports
>>>>> opening for querying, i.e., as follows:
>>>>> 
>>>>> server1:port1 server2:port2 server3:port3 server4:port4
>>>>> 
>>>>> I want to use the `--resolv-file=<path>' option to invoking
>>>>> the file which stored the infomation for these servers.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Say, I named this file as resolv-file.dnsmasq, and its
>>>>> content has the following forms:
>>>>> 
>>>>> server server1#port1 server server2#port2 server
>>>>> server3#port3 server server4#port4
>>>>> 
>>>>> Then I use the following command to run the dnsmasq:
>>>>> 
>>>>> sudo dnsmasq -d -p 5353 -r /path/to/resolv-file.dnsmasq
>>>>> --all-servers
>>>>> 
>>>>> But, at this step, I get the following errors:
>>>>> 
>>>>> dnsmasq: no servers found in /path/to/resolv-file.dnsmasq,
>>>>> will retry
>>>>> 
>>>>> So, how to let dnsmasq using multiple upstream dns servers
>>>>> with non-standard ports?
>>>>> 
>>>>> Regards
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________ 
>>>> Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list 
>>>> Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk 
>>>> http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>>>> 
> 
> 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)
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=fetp
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

_______________________________________________
Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list
Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk
http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss

Reply via email to