Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Dnsmasq does not cache a authoritative response from upstream ?

2015-10-20 Thread Simon Kelley
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 17/10/15 01:59, Carlos Carvalho wrote: > A non-recursive upstream is of little use. I suggest putting a > warning in the logs and leaving it as is. There is already a warning if any upstream server is not recursive. Simon. > >

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Enable bogus-priv by default

2015-10-20 Thread Simon Kelley
To add to the list of canonical uses for dnsmasq: DHCP and DNS services to VMs and containers in things like OpenStack. These typically use RFC1918 addresses (there's no point in being able to spin a new VM in seconds if you have to go buy it a real IPv4 address on the black market first.) so

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] RFC6303 support - especially IPv6

2015-10-20 Thread Simon Kelley
On 19/10/15 14:01, Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant wrote: > Hi Simon, > > I wonder if I could encourage you to look at extending the 'bogus-priv' > option to include some IPv6 zones? In essence dnsmasq is currently > forwarding ipv6 link-local reverse queries when in reality root servers > aren't going

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] ProxyDHCP with UEFI systems

2015-10-20 Thread Simon Kelley
Is there any sort of standards document that explains how this is supposed to work in EFI? Cheers, Simon. On 19/10/15 12:54, Michael Kuron wrote: > I made some changes to dnsmasq (patch below) that remove the PXE menu system > (the option 43 stuff) if there’s only one menu entry and put the

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Safe to use static DHCP allocations within dynamic range?

2015-10-20 Thread Simon Kelley
On 15/10/15 12:39, Ed W wrote: > Hi, I'm not quite clear from the manual pages, so can I please get a > definitive answer: > > - Am I safe to use to assign a static IP allocation using --dhcp-host > options, *within* an IP range allocated using --dhcp-range ? > > Specifically, whilst I realise

[Dnsmasq-discuss] dhcpv6 problem with static allocations and "no addresses available"

2015-10-20 Thread Carlos Carvalho
I'm stumbling on an important problem that looks like a bug in dnsmasq. Clients declared statically in a zone are being denied their address with the message "no addresses available": Oct 20 09:56:10 dnsmasq-dhcp[18342]: 6947286 available DHCPv6 subnet: 2801:82:80ff:7f05::/64 Oct 20 09:56:10

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] RFC6303 support - especially IPv6

2015-10-20 Thread Carlos Carvalho
Simon Kelley (si...@thekelleys.org.uk) wrote on Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 06:26:21PM BRST: > On 19/10/15 14:01, Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant wrote: > > Hi Simon, > > > > I wonder if I could encourage you to look at extending the 'bogus-priv' > > option to include some IPv6 zones? In essence dnsmasq is

[Dnsmasq-discuss] Specifying an 'NS' record possible?

2015-10-20 Thread ku . gro . syellekeht
Is it possible to specify an NS record? I am attempting to setup a fully working DNS server (i.e. ns1.danols.com) however it appears not to be possible because dnsmasq does not return a NS record. -- (Dnsmasq-discuss) ___ Dnsmasq-discuss mailing