Simon Kelley (si...@thekelleys.org.uk) wrote on Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 08:20:48PM
BRST:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
>
>
> On 22/10/15 21:05, Carlos Carvalho wrote:
>
> > What if, with an id* declaration, dnsmasq accepts any DUID the
> > first time but refuses other requ
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
I'm not clear how the current behaviour should change.
For DHCPv4, if a DHCP client renews a lease which isn;t in the
database, then it gets added - this is explicitly to improve behaviour
when the lease database is lost. Maybe the same should be do
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 22/10/15 21:05, Carlos Carvalho wrote:
> What if, with an id* declaration, dnsmasq accepts any DUID the
> first time but refuses other requests with different DUIDs? This
> hypothesis explains the events above and all others I've seen.
> Howeve
Albert ARIBAUD (albert.arib...@free.fr) wrote on Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at
04:12:07PM BRST:
> What you have not described, however, is how your interfaces are
> configured. Could you produce the result of ifconfig -a, or else
> the content of /etc/network/interfaces file or equivalent?
It's done by a
Bonjour Carlos,
Le Thu, 22 Oct 2015 16:05:12 -0200, Carlos Carvalho
a écrit :
> Albert ARIBAUD (albert.arib...@free.fr) wrote on Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at
> 02:33:28PM BRST:
> > Hi Carlos,
> >
> > Le Thu, 22 Oct 2015 12:50:14 -0200, Carlos Carvalho
> > a écrit :
> >
> > > Albert ARIBAUD (albert.a
Albert ARIBAUD (albert.arib...@free.fr) wrote on Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at
02:33:28PM BRST:
> Hi Carlos,
>
> Le Thu, 22 Oct 2015 12:50:14 -0200, Carlos Carvalho
> a écrit :
>
> > Albert ARIBAUD (albert.arib...@free.fr) wrote on Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at
> > 03:20:34AM BRST:
> > > Le Wed, 21 Oct 2015 20:
Bonjour Carlos,
Le Thu, 22 Oct 2015 15:40:59 -0200, Carlos Carvalho
a écrit :
> Albert ARIBAUD (albert.arib...@free.fr) wrote on Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at
> 03:07:59PM BRST:
> > Hi Neil,
> >
> > Le Thu, 22 Oct 2015 16:46:41 +, Neil Jerram
> > a écrit :
> > >
> > > Could it be because even sta
Albert ARIBAUD (albert.arib...@free.fr) wrote on Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at
03:07:59PM BRST:
> Hi Neil,
>
> Le Thu, 22 Oct 2015 16:46:41 +, Neil Jerram
> a écrit :
> >
> > Could it be because even static allocations still require a matching IP
> > range to be configured?
>
> They don't. I've got
Hi Neil,
Le Thu, 22 Oct 2015 16:46:41 +, Neil Jerram
a écrit :
> >>> interface=meteo dhcp-range=::,constructor:meteo,static,infinite
> >>> enable-ra dhcp-range=192.168.5.1,static
>
> Could it be because even static allocations still require a matching IP
> range to be configured?
They don
Hi Carlos,
Le Thu, 22 Oct 2015 12:50:14 -0200, Carlos Carvalho
a écrit :
> Albert ARIBAUD (albert.arib...@free.fr) wrote on Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at
> 03:20:34AM BRST:
> > Le Wed, 21 Oct 2015 20:18:42 -0200, Carlos Carvalho
> > a écrit :
> >
> > > > Maybe there are leases for old UIDS and the sta
On 22/10/15 00:06, Carlos Carvalho wrote:
> Simon Kelley (si...@thekelleys.org.uk) wrote on Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at
> 07:51:32PM BRST:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA256
>>
>>
>>
>> On 20/10/15 22:33, Carlos Carvalho wrote:
>>> I'm stumbling on an important problem that looks like
Albert ARIBAUD (albert.arib...@free.fr) wrote on Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at
03:20:34AM BRST:
> Le Wed, 21 Oct 2015 20:18:42 -0200, Carlos Carvalho
> a écrit :
>
> > > Maybe there are leases for old UIDS and the static address still the
> > > database?
> >
> > No, I start dnsmasq without any lease.
>
12 matches
Mail list logo
