Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] systemd service improvements

On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 05:19:54PM -0400, Craig Andrews wrote: > I have no argument against only installing the systemd unit if a > configure flag is specified. Many pieces of software do it that way - I > think the important thing is that it's available from dnsmasq. So I > rescind my thought

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] systemd service improvements

On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 10:58:56AM -0400, Craig Andrews wrote: > I'd like to propose a couple changes in terms of systemd in dnsmaq. > First, dnsmasq should always install a systemd unit so all > distributions/users can use it (if a user/distro doesn't use systemd, > the unit will be simply be

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] systemd service improvements

Greetings and salutations, On 30.06.2016 16:18, Albert ARIBAUD wrote: Bonjour, Le Thu, 30 Jun 2016 21:18:02 +0200 Pali Rohár a écrit: On Thursday 30 June 2016 16:58:56 Craig Andrews wrote: > I'd like to propose a couple changes in terms of systemd in dnsmaq. > First,

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] systemd service improvements

Bonjour, Le Thu, 30 Jun 2016 21:18:02 +0200 Pali Rohár a écrit: > On Thursday 30 June 2016 16:58:56 Craig Andrews wrote: > > I'd like to propose a couple changes in terms of systemd in dnsmaq. > > First, dnsmasq should always install a systemd unit so all > >

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] systemd service improvements

On Thursday 30 June 2016 16:58:56 Craig Andrews wrote: > I'd like to propose a couple changes in terms of systemd in dnsmaq. > First, dnsmasq should always install a systemd unit so all > distributions/users can use it I'm against such change. Why on the Earth install useless files into system

[Dnsmasq-discuss] systemd service improvements

I'd like to propose a couple changes in terms of systemd in dnsmaq. First, dnsmasq should always install a systemd unit so all distributions/users can use it (if a user/distro doesn't use systemd, the unit will be simply be ignored - no harm done). Currently, the unit is only part of the

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Win10 Dhcpv6 issue?

This seems to have just been another Windows 10 Stupid (I thought I'd gotten away with not having any). I followed this article and deleted both DUID keys in the registry and it seems to be able to maintain a lease. https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/kb/2711727 Support page appears to apply

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] dnsmasq to provide public DNS service

Hi Tong, Le Thu, 30 Jun 2016 12:03:07 + (UTC) T o n g a écrit: > Does no reply means impossible, or just nobody has look into it yet? It is perfectly possible tu run dnsmasq as a "public" DNS, if by this you mean "make it serve requests from other hosts than the