Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] dnsmasq not providing a response to client

2016-09-07 Thread Bill Warren
Hello Albert, Thank you so much for the helpful response. This is my first time using tcpdump, so please excuse any novice mistakes. > On Sep 7, 2016, at 01:54, Albert ARIBAUD wrote: > > Hello Bill, > > Le Tue, 6 Sep 2016 19:17:56 -0400 > Bill Warren a écrit: > >> Greetings from a new user

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Feature request

2016-09-07 Thread Archimede Pitagorico
Hi Albert. thanks for your reply. My example with just 2 domains was merely for illustration. I do indeed need wildcards. I know that if the set of possibilities is finite and known in advance I could just enumerate all the possibilities. Regards _

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Feature request

2016-09-07 Thread Archimede Pitagorico
Hi Albert. thanks for your reply. My example with just 2 domains was merely for illustration. I do indeed need wildcards. I know that if the set of possibilities is finite and known in advance I could just enumerate all the possibilities.   Regards _

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Hiding/obscuring version.bind

2016-09-07 Thread Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant
Attached (in case the git send-email didn't work) Kevin :-) On 06/09/16 21:23, Simon Kelley wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 a) I tend to agree that it's pointless. b) Not a run-time option, there are too many of those already. c) Maybe the simplest solution is something

[Dnsmasq-discuss] [PATCH] dnsmasq: compile time option NO_ID

2016-09-07 Thread Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant
Some consider it good practice to obscure software version numbers to clients. Compiling with -DNO_ID removes the *.bind info structure. This includes: version, author, copyright, cachesize, cache insertions, evictions, misses & hits, auth & servers. Signed-off-by: Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant --- s

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Feature request

2016-09-07 Thread Albert ARIBAUD
Hi Archi, Le Wed, 7 Sep 2016 10:03:04 +0200 "Archimede Pitagorico" a écrit: > I use a lot the --server and --ipset options. In brief, I want > certain domains to be dispatched to a special DNS and their IP > address to be stored in an ipset, so that using iptables and policy > routing I can disp

[Dnsmasq-discuss] Feature request

2016-09-07 Thread Archimede Pitagorico
I use a lot the --server and --ipset options. In brief, I want certain domains to be dispatched to a special DNS and their IP address to be stored in an ipset, so that using iptables and policy routing I can dispatch all traffic to these web sites via a special interface.   it all works well, exc