Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Receive your own posts to the list?

[Geert Stappers]

On Fri, Jan 05, 2018 at 09:19:54AM +0100, Geert Stappers wrote:
> Hi,
>
> At http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/mailman/options/dnsmasq-discuss
> is option 'Receive your own posts to the list?' set to 'Yes' for me.
>
> But I don't receive my own posts send to this mailing list.
>
> Postings from others to the ML are received.
>
>
> My postings are archived, examples given
>  http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/pipermail/dnsmasq-discuss/2018q1/011864.html
>  http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/pipermail/dnsmasq-discuss/2018q1/011865.html
>
> On other mailingslists I do get copies of my own posts.
>
>
> Do get other posters to this ML their own posts?
>[ ]  Yes, works for me

 [x] Yes, works for me :-/


>[ ]  No, I don't get my own posts
>
>
> What is needed to get own posts??
>

patience

An email has a round-trip-time of about a half hour

| Received: from bytemark.thekelleys.org.uk (bytemark.thekelleys.org.uk 
[213.138.109.107])
| by gpm.stappers.nl (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5613D304009
| for ; Fri,  5 Jan 2018 09:01:37 +0100 (CET)
| Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bytemark.thekelleys.org.uk)
| by bytemark.thekelleys.org.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.80)
| (envelope-from )
| id 1eXMO4-0006vV-Ei
| for stapp...@stappers.nl; Fri, 05 Jan 2018 07:25:56 +
| Received: from gpm.stappers.nl ([82.161.218.215])
| by bytemark.thekelleys.org.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.80)
| (envelope-from ) id 1eXMNu-0006vO-UQ
| for dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk; Fri, 05 Jan 2018 
07:25:47 +
| Received: by gpm.stappers.nl (Postfix, from userid 1000)
| id 7F0FC304032; Fri,  5 Jan 2018 08:25:46 +0100 (CET)


Groeten
Geert Stappers
--
Leven en laten leven

___
Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list
Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk
http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss

[Dnsmasq-discuss] Receive your own posts to the list?

[Geert Stappers]

Hi,

At http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/mailman/options/dnsmasq-discuss 
is option 'Receive your own posts to the list?' set to 'Yes' for me.

But I don't receive my own posts send to this mailing list.

Postings from others to the ML are received.


My postings are archived, examples given
 http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/pipermail/dnsmasq-discuss/2018q1/011864.html
 http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/pipermail/dnsmasq-discuss/2018q1/011865.html

On other mailingslists I do get copies of my own posts.


Do get other posters to this ML their own posts? 
   [ ]  Yes, works for me
   [ ]  No, I don't get my own posts


What is needed to get own posts??


Groeten
Geert Stappers
-- 
Leven en laten leven

___
Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list
Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk
http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] dnsmasq continuous integration

[Geert Stappers]

On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 09:27:34PM +, Simon Kelley wrote:
> On 13/12/17 10:10, Petr Men?ík wrote:
> > Hello everyone.
> > 
> > I maintain dnsmasq in Fedora and Red Hat Enterprise Linux.
> > 
> > We build for different sets of architectures and have some tests for
> > several packages. Dnsmasq is used for libvirt and network manager as a
> > dependency. In short, dnsmasq is important to us.
> > 
> > We lack something that we could attach after every build to test dnsmasq
> > is not (completely) broken. I do not know of any tests included in
> > dnsmasq repository. Is there any external repository that can be used to
> > validate dnsmasq still behaves properly? Is anyone using some kind of
> > continuos integration to ensure new build work at least the same as the
> > former one? I myself already made patches that broke some architectures
> > and some not. Such things are not easy to discover.
> > 
> > I currently assume no one has open source tests that can be used to
> > verify dnsmasq behavior right now. I would be glad if that was not true.
> > In the other case I would like to start some basic test suite, that can
> > be run to validate new build. I would like to make something useful that
> > could be merged into the repository sometime in the future.
> > 
> > I have a couple of questions:
> > * Do you know good and powerful enough framework to write such tests?
> > * Is there interest to cooperate on test suite? I think we could all
> > benefit from this, making dnsmasq more reliable.
> > * What language and library should be used for tests writing?
> > * Which tools would be useful for testing?
> > 
> > My kind of requirements:
> >   - setup support of temporary addresses, network namespaces or
> > containers would be useful
> >   - I would like to avoid reinventing the wheel, starting with bash
> > scripts, that would be simple at the start and hell to maintain later
> >   - I think scripting languages are more suited for complicated test
> > setup with more than one daemon instance
> >   - Preferred language would be python for me. Avocado [1] was
> > recommended to me. It is packaged in Fedora, but not in Debian. Because
> > Simon is Debian packager, I think something with good support on Debian
> > should be chosen. Do you know something?
> >   - check library [2] seems interesting. I am afraid current code would
> > be not easily broken into unit tests written in C
> >   - tests can be started as a single test or set of tests, failure
> > should be reported for each single test separately
> >   - dig would be useful for dns queries. ldns-testns can be quite useful
> > for special upstream DNS servers.   
> > 
> > What do you think? Any opinions would be appreciated.
> > 
> 
> I don't know of any such testing system, and I don't use one at present,
> the best I can do is fairly strict dogfood testing: the latest code is
> always running in the network router chez Kelleys.
> 
> If such a thing can be produced, I would be very interested in running it.


I read that as   "patches welcome":-)

 
 [1] https://github.com/avocado-framework/avocado
 [2] https://libcheck.github.io/check/


Groeten
Geert Stappers
-- 
Leven en laten leven

___
Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list
Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk
http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss