[Dnsmasq-discuss] Question about the behavior of options 66 and 67

2018-07-24 Thread Shankar Unni
One of our users ran into an interesting issue. They have IP phones that explicitly request options 66 and 67 as part of their DHCP Parameter Request List of the DISCOVER/REQUEST, but still expect the resultant OFFER/ACK to return those values in the “sname” and “file” fields (within the

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] local dns broke

2018-07-24 Thread Carl Karsten
adding domain=home helped sort of. I can now resolve other names on my lan, but still not pc8. pc8 is dnsmasq dhcp/dns for my lan, static ip 192.168.1.8 twist is ubunut xenial, seems to work ok dc10b is ubuntu bionic that won't resolve pc8 unless I tell it server 192.168.1.8 before setting

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] local dns broke

2018-07-24 Thread john doe
On 7/24/2018 7:47 AM, Carl Karsten wrote: On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 12:32 AM, Geert Stappers wrote: On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 06:02:02PM -0500, Carl Karsten wrote: On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 4:16 PM, Geert Stappers wrote: What do the other client fine that the netplan client doesn't do?

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] local dns broke

2018-07-24 Thread Carl Karsten
On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 12:32 AM, Geert Stappers wrote: > On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 06:02:02PM -0500, Carl Karsten wrote: >> On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 4:16 PM, Geert Stappers wrote: >> > >> > What do the other client fine that the netplan client doesn't do? >> > >> >> resolve local names. >> >>