Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Announce: dnsmasq-2.81

2020-04-12 Thread Matthias Andree
Am 12.04.20 um 00:28 schrieb Simon Kelley: > After 18 long months, tonight I released dnsmasq 2.81. > > The next release should happen to a shorter timescale. > > http://thekelleys.org.uk/dnsmasq/dnsmasq-2.81.tar.gz > Simon thank you, I have updated FreeBSD's ports last night, the update should

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Prefix delegation with DNSmasq

2020-04-12 Thread Uwe Schindler
Hi, although this is no longer fully related to dnsmasq, just a few sentences on top: > >> There's a slightly more special case for us: We have one central firewall > (which > >> gets the full /56 net on the upstream interface routed to it) and most > gateways > >> are separate nodes > >> (i.e.

[Dnsmasq-discuss] ignore mac address for one of the dhcp

2020-04-12 Thread John Siu
I am running dnsmasq on a multiple port box. Following are dhcp config for the lan and dmz ports: --- ## LAN dhcp-range=tag:lan,::1,constructor:lan,ra-names,72h # IPv6 dhcp-range=tag:lan,172.16.168.130,172.16.168.250,72h # IPv4 dhcp-option=tag:lan,option:router,172.16.168.1 # option 3 default gw

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Prefix delegation with DNSmasq

2020-04-12 Thread Uwe Schindler
Hi, > thanks for the elaborate reply! No problem! > There's a slightly more special case for us: We have one central firewall > (which > gets the full /56 net on the upstream interface routed to it) and most > gateways > are separate nodes > (i.e. most VLANs are not connected to the central

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Prefix delegation with DNSmasq

2020-04-12 Thread Oliver Freyermuth
Hi, Am 12.04.20 um 20:12 schrieb Uwe Schindler: > Hi, > >> thanks for the elaborate reply! > > No problem! and thanks again :-). > >> There's a slightly more special case for us: We have one central firewall >> (which >> gets the full /56 net on the upstream interface routed to it) and

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Prefix delegation with DNSmasq

2020-04-12 Thread Oliver Freyermuth
Am 12.04.20 um 19:25 schrieb Simon Kelley: > I'd split your /56 into as many /64s as you need, and set up routing as > required (either static or using some routing daemon). Run dnsmasq > centrally, and use DHCpv6 relays to proxy DHCPv6 requests from the > router on each /64 network back to the

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Prefix delegation with DNSmasq

2020-04-12 Thread Oliver Freyermuth
Hi, thanks for the elaborate reply! Am 12.04.20 um 19:33 schrieb Uwe Schindler: > Hi > >> I have a setup in mind and wonder whether dnsmasq is the correct tool (since >> I >> have not found the necessary functionality in the documentation yet). >> >> We have a /56 IPv6 network, and plan to

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Prefix delegation with DNSmasq

2020-04-12 Thread Oliver Freyermuth
Am 12.04.20 um 19:01 schrieb Simon Kelley: > The first question is, how static are your global addresses? Making a > network which can survive renumbering is a lot more difficult than one > with known and fixed addresses. Luckily, they are completely static :-). Cheers, Oliver > > >

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Prefix delegation with DNSmasq

2020-04-12 Thread Simon Kelley
I'd split your /56 into as many /64s as you need, and set up routing as required (either static or using some routing daemon). Run dnsmasq centrally, and use DHCpv6 relays to proxy DHCPv6 requests from the router on each /64 network back to the central dnsmasq instance. Simon. On 12/04/2020

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Prefix delegation with DNSmasq

2020-04-12 Thread Uwe Schindler
Hi > I have a setup in mind and wonder whether dnsmasq is the correct tool (since I > have not found the necessary functionality in the documentation yet). > > We have a /56 IPv6 network, and plan to use pure DHCPv6 (no stateless > autoconfiguration) in several /64 networks. That's perfect.

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Prefix delegation with DNSmasq

2020-04-12 Thread Simon Kelley
The first question is, how static are your global addresses? Making a network which can survive renumbering is a lot more difficult than one with known and fixed addresses. Simon. On 12/04/2020 17:20, Oliver Freyermuth wrote: > Dear DNSmasqers, > > I have a setup in mind and wonder whether

[Dnsmasq-discuss] Prefix delegation with DNSmasq

2020-04-12 Thread Oliver Freyermuth
Dear DNSmasqers, I have a setup in mind and wonder whether dnsmasq is the correct tool (since I have not found the necessary functionality in the documentation yet). We have a /56 IPv6 network, and plan to use pure DHCPv6 (no stateless autoconfiguration) in several /64 networks. There are

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Announce: dnsmasq-2.81

2020-04-12 Thread Geert Stappers
On Sat, Apr 11, 2020 at 11:28:25PM +0100, Simon Kelley wrote: > After 18 long months, tonight I released dnsmasq 2.81. > > The next release should happen to a shorter timescale. > > http://thekelleys.org.uk/dnsmasq/dnsmasq-2.81.tar.gz > > > Enjoy. > Simon. > Thanks Is the release date