Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] v2.83 failed to send packet: Network is unreachable

2021-01-21 Thread Steve Hirsch
Hi Lonnie, I am also seeing an occasional “failed to send packet: Address family not supported by protocol”. However, it is mostly “Network Unreachable” and they are pretty continuous (much more than the 10 you have). Dnscrypt is configured to use DoH to cloudflare servers. On my side,

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] v2.83 failed to send packet: Network is unreachable

2021-01-21 Thread Lonnie Abelbeck
> On Jan 21, 2021, at 5:53 PM, Steve Hirsch wrote: > > After upgrading dnsmasq from version 2.82 to version 2.83 on Arch Linux > (kernel 5.10.9), “failed to send packet: Network is unreachable” errors > continually show up. However, name resolution still appears to work with > v2.83.

[Dnsmasq-discuss] v2.83 failed to send packet: Network is unreachable

2021-01-21 Thread Steve Hirsch
After upgrading dnsmasq from version 2.82 to version 2.83 on Arch Linux (kernel 5.10.9), “failed to send packet: Network is unreachable” errors continually show up. However, name resolution still appears to work with v2.83. Downgrading back to v2.82, and the error messages go away. Dnsmasq

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Request to have an official Dnsmasq mirror on GitHub

2021-01-21 Thread Geert Stappers
On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 01:50:04PM -0800, Dan Schaper wrote: > Geert, Hello Mailinglist, > What the hell are you babbling about? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drinking_the_Kool-Aid > Best, > Dan Regards Geert Stappers -- Silence is hard to parse

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Request to have an official Dnsmasq mirror on GitHub

2021-01-21 Thread Dan Schaper
Geert, What the hell are you babbling about? Best, Dan -Original Message- From: Dnsmasq-discuss On Behalf Of Geert Stappers Sent: Thursday, January 21, 2021 1:24 PM To: dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk Subject: Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Request to have an official Dnsmasq mirror on

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Request to have an official Dnsmasq mirror on GitHub

2021-01-21 Thread Geert Stappers
On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 06:14:49PM +0800, Wang Shanker wrote: > > 2021年01月21日 17:46，- Neustradamus - 写道： > > > > Hello all, > > > > I wish you a Happy New Year! > > > > To have a perfect development of Dnsmasq, > > it is possible to create an official mirror on GitHub? Fairly ignorant the

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] [RESEND PATCH] Only bind IPv6 wildcard when it is enabled

2021-01-21 Thread Pali Rohár
On Thursday 21 January 2021 14:52:22 Matthias May wrote: > On 21/01/2021 14:20, Pali Rohár wrote: > > Hello! > > > > On Thursday 21 January 2021 14:00:10 Matthias May wrote: > >> On Linux when IPv6 is disabled, one would not expect Dnsmasq to bind > >> the IPv6 wildcard. > > > > And it is a

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] [RESEND PATCH] Only bind IPv6 wildcard when it is enabled

2021-01-21 Thread Geert Stappers
On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 02:20:58PM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote: > Hello! > > On Thursday 21 January 2021 14:00:10 Matthias May wrote: > > On Linux when IPv6 is disabled, one would not expect Dnsmasq to bind > > the IPv6 wildcard. > > And it is a problem? I would expect that if IPv6 is disabled then

[Dnsmasq-discuss] [PATCH v2] Only bind IPv6 wildcard when it is enabled

2021-01-21 Thread Matthias May
On Linux when IPv6 is disabled, one would not expect Dnsmasq to bind the IPv6 wildcard. This patch adds a condition to the wildcard bind function, which checks on Linux if IPv6 is disabled. v2: fix return value of is_ipv6_disabled() with IPv6 support not compiled in Signed-off-by: Matthias May

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] [RESEND PATCH] Only bind IPv6 wildcard when it is enabled

2021-01-21 Thread Matthias May
On 21/01/2021 14:20, Pali Rohár wrote: > Hello! > > On Thursday 21 January 2021 14:00:10 Matthias May wrote: >> On Linux when IPv6 is disabled, one would not expect Dnsmasq to bind >> the IPv6 wildcard. > > And it is a problem? I would expect that if IPv6 is disabled then > applications

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] [RESEND PATCH] Only bind IPv6 wildcard when it is enabled

2021-01-21 Thread Pali Rohár
Hello! On Thursday 21 January 2021 14:00:10 Matthias May wrote: > On Linux when IPv6 is disabled, one would not expect Dnsmasq to bind > the IPv6 wildcard. And it is a problem? I would expect that if IPv6 is disabled then applications (including dnsmasq) cannot bind to the IPv6 address for

[Dnsmasq-discuss] [PATCH] Connection track mark based DNS query filtering.

2021-01-21 Thread Etan Kissling
This extends query filtering support beyond what is currently possible with the `--ipset` configuration option, by adding support for: 1) Specifying allowlists on a per-client basis, based on their associated Linux connection track mark. 2) Dynamic configuration of allowlists via Ubus. 3)

[Dnsmasq-discuss] [RESEND PATCH] Only bind IPv6 wildcard when it is enabled

2021-01-21 Thread Matthias May
On Linux when IPv6 is disabled, one would not expect Dnsmasq to bind the IPv6 wildcard. This patch adds a condition to the wildcard bind function, which checks on Linux if IPv6 is disabled. Signed-off-by: Matthias May Signed-off-by: Zefir Kurtisi --- src/dnsmasq.h | 1 + src/network.c | 24

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Request to have an official Dnsmasq mirror on GitHub

2021-01-21 Thread Wang Shanker
It seems that someone has already built one, and the owner is willing to give the ownership. https://github.com/dnsmasq/dnsmasq Cheers, Miao Wang > 2021年01月21日 17:46，- Neustradamus - 写道： > > Hello all, > > I wish you a Happy New Year! > > To have a perfect development of Dnsmasq, it is

[Dnsmasq-discuss] Request to have an official Dnsmasq mirror on GitHub

2021-01-21 Thread - Neustradamus -
Hello all, I wish you a Happy New Year! To have a perfect development of Dnsmasq, it is possible to create an official mirror on GitHub? For example, there is a fork here: - https://github.com/guns/dnsmasq A search: - https://github.com/search?o=desc=dnsmasq=updated=Repositories There are