Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] dnsmasq not overriding leases for static assigments

> > To answer the question, the host doesn't get the same address because > "multiple MAC addresses on the same line" is NOT the same as a MAC > address with wildcards in it. If you had > > dhcp-host=96:8d:d4:d0:4d:e3,a4:50:46:d0:4d:e3,192.168.0.217 > > then it would work, but > >

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] "multiple MAC addresses in a single dhcp-host" vs "multiple dhcp-host lines with the same IP address"

I also tried with explicit mac addresses (no wildcards) with the same result. And yes, I have a tp-link one-mesh system with one router and three APs. The APs change the client mac-addr with a combination of three-last-octects of the AP's mac-addr and three-last-octects of the client's On Mon,

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] "multiple MAC addresses in a single dhcp-host" vs "multiple dhcp-host lines with the same IP address"

On 5/17/21 5:30 AM, Jesus M Diaz wrote: dhcp-host=*:*:*:d0:4d:e3,set:mobile,192.168.0.217,xiaomi-a2 i have to wonder if using wildcards counts as "multiple mac addresses"... what happens if you explicitly set all four* of the possible mac addresses instead of using the asterisk wildcards?

[Dnsmasq-discuss] "multiple MAC addresses in a single dhcp-host" vs "multiple dhcp-host lines with the same IP address"

Hello, I am having an issue with this (see *[Dnsmasq-discuss] dnsmasq not overriding leases for static assignments* thread), but in summary, the problem is that this is not working for me: I have one dhcp-host configuration line with multiple mac-addr for one ip-addr, but dnsmasq don't assign the

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] dnsmasq not overriding leases for static assigments

A couple of new things: 1. I have updated the version of dnsmasq from 2.72 to 2.82, cloned from *https://salsa.debian.org/debian/dnsmasq * and compiled locally. 2. Now I see a more explicit message in the log, making very clear the wrong behaviour: tail

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] dnsmasq not overriding leases for static assigments

On Sun, May 16, 2021 at 06:48:59PM +0100, Jesus M Diaz wrote: > > > > > > So, this is how the identification happens and I can know it did happen > > > > More like > > } So, this is how the identification should happen and I hope it did happen > > > > > well, setting the tag 'mobile' and 'known'