that
job.
Having said all of the above, I should admit that the OS in question could be
non-compliant with the PXE specification. Maybe it should use a different
mechanism like vendor options or a configuration file (advertised via
bootfile-name)
ow how to do the PXE proxy-server tricks.
It seems that the discussion went into a direction that I didn't expect.
Let me try to make it simpler (for me) again.
So, should dnsmasq in the DHCP proxy mode be able to send a root-path option?
--
Andriy Gapon
___
e DHCP lease information and the NFS path information
to the kernel, so that the kernel can properly configure its network interface
and mount the root filesystem over NFS.
--
Andriy Gapon
___
Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list
Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys
On 25/05/2017 14:29, Simon Kelley wrote:
>
>
> On 23/05/17 07:05, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>> On 23/05/2017 01:14, Simon Kelley wrote:
>>> To the best of my knowledge it's _only_ PXE clients which can accept
>>> extra options from a proxy. PXE is a
ng-with-dnsmasq-in-proxy-mode/
https://wiki.fogproject.org/wiki/index.php?title=ProxyDHCP_with_dnsmasq
https://manski.net/2016/09/pxe-server-on-existing-network-dhcp-proxy-on-ubuntu/
http://danielboca.blogspot.com/2012/02/boot-linux-from-network-using-pxe-and.html
--
Andriy Gapon
__
