On Thu, 31 Mar 2005 15:34:36 -0800, Donnie Berkholz spyder...@gentoo.org
wrote:
I'm having trouble setting static IP addresses and hostnames based on
the hardware address.
Relevant dnsmasq.conf settings (dhcp-host is nearly the same as in
dnsmasq.conf.example):
On Thu, 31 Mar 2005 17:23:02 -0800, Donnie Berkholz spyder...@gentoo.org
wrote:
Yeah, that's sort of orthogonal to what I'm trying to do. I want to set
the IP and hostname from the server based on the client's MAC, rather
than giving the client an IP based on what it thinks its hostname is.
On Thu, 2 Jun 2005 13:16:35 -0700, Cory Riddell spamcridd...@gmail.com wrote:
Am I looking in the wrong place for the log? Do I need to specify
something else in the dnsmasq.conf file?
Mine show in /var/log/debug, you may need adjust /etc/syslog.conf
Been a long time since I set it up. Just
On Sun, 20 Jul 2008 15:20:09 +0100, Simon Kelley si...@thekelleys.org.uk
wrote:
I've released dnsmasq version 2.44. This is a stability release. It
fixes crash problems in 2.43. The crashes occur when a DHCP client
renews a non-existant lease for an invalid subnet, when a DHCP client
which
On Sun, 20 Jul 2008 20:27:52 +0100, Simon Kelley si...@thekelleys.org.uk
wrote:
dnsmasq 2.45 is now available. This fixes a regression in 2.44 which
breaks DNS unless min-port is set. I'm removing the 2.44 tarball from
the website to avoid confusion.
The breakage was caused by some
On Thu, 24 Jul 2008 10:00:18 -0600, Brad Morgan b-mor...@concentric.net
wrote:
Three options come to mind; either
1) drop that threshold in syslog.conf,
2) add a line to syslog.conf to log all messages logged to the DAEMON
facility (or whatever you've set with log-facility) to another file.
Hi there,
My linux boxes all have static addresses, but dnsmasq is set to give
DHCP address to 'casual' boxes, usually a friend's box over for a
fixup, etc.
Today I installed linux on a friend's box with DHCP lookup, but I
cannot login by name:
$ ssh sharkey
ssh: Could not resolve hostname
On Fri, 12 Sep 2008 13:53:28 +0200, Jan 'RedBully' Seiffert
redbu...@cc.hs-owl.de wrote:
...
I think 1430 is one of those optimised values, and 1458 maybe still to big
for
pppoa, but i'm not sure. Did you tried 1454 1452? I think it's something
with
145[0-9] from what i read. Or is BT
On Tue, 27 Jan 2009 22:03:58 +, you wrote:
It's time to begin another step on the long road to Nirvana for dnsmasq.
I've made a first release candidate of dnsmasq version-2.47 available at
http://www.thekelleys.org.uk/dnsmasq/release-candidates/dnsmasq-2.47rc1.tar.gz
On Thu, 20 May 2010 21:29:17 +0100, you wrote:
Now seems to be a good time to start the process of releasing
dnsmasq-2.53. There's no outstanding development work, and a fairly fat
list of changes since 2.52, back in January.
Therefore I've made a first release candidate, available at
On Thu, 03 Jun 2010 19:55:43 +0100, you wrote:
Dnsmasq version 2.53 is now available from
http://www.thekelleys.org.uk/dnsmasq/dnsmasq-2.53.tar.gz
or
http://www.thekelleys.org.uk/dnsmasq/dnsmasq-2.53.tar.lzma
Thanks to all who contributed to this release: they are mentioned in the
CHANGELOG,
On Sat, 31 Jul 2010 21:29:46 -0700, you wrote:
Sorry,
I've been replying to specific people.. I guess it has to be the list..
Look for a reply all button :) That way the person and the list get
to see your response, if you want the rest of the list to participate.
Grant.
On Wed, 12 Jan 2011 21:09:23 +, you wrote:
It's six months since the last stable release of dnsmasq, and quite a
lot of work has accumulated since, so I'm starting to work towards the
release version of version 2.56.
Hence I've made available
13 matches
Mail list logo
