Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Is dnsmasq supposed to listen on UDP port 0.0.0.0:67 when listen-address is specified?

re it), so there will be more retries in general for DHCP traffic. On Fri, Dec 22, 2017 at 2:46 AM, Parke <parke.ne...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 2:56 AM, Ignat Korchagin <ig...@cloudflare.com> > wrote: > > FYI a good overview of SO_REUSEPORT a

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Is dnsmasq supposed to listen on UDP port 0.0.0.0:67 when listen-address is specified?

FYI a good overview of SO_REUSEPORT at least in Linux is here https://blog.cloudflare.com/the-sad-state-of-linux-socket-balancing/ On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 5:45 AM, Parke wrote: > On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 9:18 PM, Parke wrote: > > And there is the

[Dnsmasq-discuss] Multiple subnets on a single broadcast domain

Hi, We have a use-case, where there maybe more than one subnet in a broadcast domain and we want one DHCP server to serve directly connected clients in these subnets. Currently, dnsmasq requires having one IP address from each subnet configured on DHCP server, otherwise it ignores DHCP requests