[Dnsmasq-discuss] /etc/hosts query

shuttle and now it works as expected (returns 192.168.1.4) Was my hosts file wrong or have I missed something in the config? It seems to me that a response of 127.0.0.1 is always going to be wrong. Cheers Steve

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] /etc/hosts query

, just as the original behavior is what is to be expected. I thought that the hosts file was as created by the installer originally (ubuntu 9.04 I think), but it's entirely possible I messed it up somewhere along the line :) Thanks Steve

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] /etc/hosts query

will make dnsmasq's replies rather more sane in this situation. Seems to be a common opinion about the hosts file :) I've added the localise-queries option too, in case I break the hosts file again. Thanks Steve

[Dnsmasq-discuss] dnsmasq as relay agent

dhcp_eval() on the server side? Kind regards Steve ___ Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] How to reserve 2 IPv6 addresses for the same host?

out how to do what I was asking for so it's not a total waste of time. The "solution" is to add the following section to /etc/systemd/network/eth1.network [DHCPv6] Hostname=pihole DUIDType=uuid DUIDRawData=00:02:00:00:ab:11:e5:57:e9:1f:92:75:89:50 On 10/3/22 10:26, Steve wrote: For y

[Dnsmasq-discuss] How to reserve 2 IPv6 addresses for the same host?

For years now I have been assigning both v4 and v6 addresses to my hosts this way dhcp-host=dmz,F0:4D:A2:2E:AB:C4,server-d, 192.168.2.2 dhcp-host=dmz,00:11:0A:5F:F7:FE,pihole, 192.168.2.3 and dhcp-host=id:00:02:00:00:AB:11:51:D7:96:BA:E4:CE:13:F5, server-d,

[Dnsmasq-discuss] Re: Crashes with 2.16?

I too have been getting random silent crashes with 2.16 with nothing in syslog. I'm running debian/sid and dnsmasq 2.16-2. It happened once or twice before, but twice so far today. I'll have to try the debug.

[Dnsmasq-discuss] trouble setting up dnsmasq as local dns + dhcp server on ubuntu

, with MAC addresses changed. /etc/hosts 127.0.0.1 localhost 192.168.0.2 cheryl-printer.slestak.homelinux.org cheryl-printer 192.168.0.11 steve-printer.slestak.homelinux.org steve-printer 192.168.0.21 cheryl-desktop.slestak.homelinux.org cheryl-desktop 192.168.0.23 e1505.slestak.homelinux.org

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] trouble setting up dnsmasq as local dns + dhcp server on ubuntu

without that. Cheers, Simon. I have removed strict-order. I have /var/log/daemon.log in MultiTail, so I am watching it. Caching appears to be working. nmap shows some hosts up, and reports their names. I will look at this further when I get home this evening. Thanks Simon! Steve

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] DNSMasq, DHCP, Shorewall, and Proxy Arp

Gaah - re-adding the mailing list.. On Saturday 02 February 2008 03:22:01 pm you wrote: On Feb 2, 2008 3:48 PM, Steve H. st...@csquaredtech.com wrote: On Saturday 02 February 2008 01:03:06 pm you wrote: This won't work, because 1.2.3.4 is outside the local subnet of the device, which

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] DNSMasq, DHCP, Shorewall, and Proxy Arp

how sort of thing, I guess I'll look at isc dhcpd. I'm rather bummed as I've been using DNSMasq for years, and its really awesome. I _love_ the DNS/DHCP integration - it makes it much easier to keep track of things when I can just do a DNS lookup to find them :-) Steve

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] DNSMasq, DHCP, Shorewall, and Proxy Arp

sub-nets configured to relay dhcp requests to 1 interface with DNSMAsq bound to it, does that interface require an I.P. address from all 4 subnets ? (i.e. will I have the same problem with dhcp relays? ) Steve

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] DNSMasq, DHCP, Shorewall, and Proxy Arp

. to the DNSMasq interface everytime I get a new sub-net. However, that would be less trouble then having to do that _and_ configure a relay for each new subnet. Thanks again for all the help, Steve

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] DNSMasq, DHCP, Shorewall, and Proxy Arp

of daily operation, its never given me a lick of trouble :-) Steve

[Dnsmasq-discuss] windows' hostname

error. - Steve

[Dnsmasq-discuss] tftp 'Permission denied' issue...

... May 14 16:01:27 regret dnsmasq-tftp[13285]: cannot access /home/Steve/Shared/workspace/xxx/xxx/bootrom.pxe.0: Permission denied May 14 16:01:27 regret dnsmasq-tftp[13285]: cannot access /home/Steve/Shared/workspace/xxx/xxx/bootrom.pxe.0: Permission denied ftp_root=/home/Steve/Shared/workspace /home

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] tftp 'Permission denied' issue...

Simon, Thanks for the response. I do not have --tftp-secure. But I do launch with sudo /etc/rc.d/initd/dnsmasq So it seems that it will be run by root. Therefore I need world readable permission on my bootrom.pxe.0. I thought I had that! --- /home/Steve/Shared/workspace/xxx/xxx

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] tftp 'Permission denied' issue...

- dnsmasq is running as nobody ps uax | grep dnsmasq nobody3661 0.0 0.0 14828 628 ?S11:31 0:00 /usr/sbin/dnsmasq -s norese.com.au Steve 4057 0.0 0.0 102744 820 pts/0S+ 11:53 0:00 grep dnsmasq But dnsmasq-tftp still fails to read the file. I'm puzzled. Steve

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] tftp 'Permission denied' issue...

Niels, Thanks for your input on this issue... 1) Your test confirms that nobody cannot access the file from outside the CWD... [Steve@regret tmp]$ sudo -u nobody cp /home/Steve/Shared/workspace/xxx/xxx/bootrom.pxe.0 . cp: cannot stat `/home/Steve/Shared/workspace/xxx/xxx/bootrom.pxe.0

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] proxyDHCP + EFI PXE

This is due to Dnsmasq's use of DHCP Option 43. Many (most?) UEFI implementations do not seem to handle this the same as bios systems. While I have not seen any definitive answers as to what has changed, there are many complaints about this on various forums. Maybe changes were made to

[Dnsmasq-discuss] Listing the current DNS servers and domain prefixes?

output this then I would like to file a suggestion that it include all upstream servers and what dns suffixes they are configured for as that would help this situation I think. Thanks so much! Steve ___ Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list Dnsmasq-discuss

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Same hostname in different domains with dhcp static assignments?

Turns out I needed dhcp-fqdn set... just setting the domain name isn't enough Sorry to have bothered ya On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 7:05 PM, Steve Hindle <mech...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi! > I seem to have an odd issue with static dhcp reservations on multiple > networks with th

[Dnsmasq-discuss] Same hostname in different domains with dhcp static assignments?

Hi! I seem to have an odd issue with static dhcp reservations on multiple networks with the same hostname but different domains (eg ' foo.ipmi.example.com' and 'foo.hvm.example.com'). I am setting static assignments for both interfaces via: dhcp-host=,,, Basically seems to break DNS lookup for me

[Dnsmasq-discuss] Does dhcp-range accept/require an interface for ipv4

Hi! When dealing with multiple interfaces/subnet, should dhcp-range be given the interface? I only see it mentioned for ipv6 stuff in the manpage, but I'm finding stuff online that says to use: dhcp-range=eth1,172.16.49.101,172.16.49.254,14400 or:

[Dnsmasq-discuss] Using a variable in the address option in dnsmasq.conf

Is it possilbe to set a variable and then use it as follows? or is there a way to set and use a variable in the conf file for address entries? myip=10.0.1.6 address=/2o7.net/$myip address=/2mdm.net/$myip instead of address=/2o7.net/10.0.1.6 address=/2mdm.net/10.0.1.6

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Using a variable in the address option in dnsmasq.conf

If I update an external conf file will dnsmasq read in the changes in real time or do I have to restart it? On Fri, Mar 2, 2018 at 10:39 AM wrote: > On 03/02/2018 07:46 AM, Petr Menšík wrote: > > and then generate your file any way you need. For example in bash > > > > echo

[Dnsmasq-discuss] dnsmasq dies after about 20 minutes

I am running dnsmasq on the lastest stretch on a rpi. For some reason dnsmasq dies after about 20 minutes, I can restart it and it will last another 20 minutes. Any insight on how to fix this would be much appreciated. Here is the status after it dies, followed by the resolvconf.conf

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] v2.83 failed to send packet: Network is unreachable

I’ve applied test1, test2, and test3 patches. So far, no “failed to send” log messages and everything appears to be working normally on Arch Linux (kernel 5.10.9). Thanks, Simon! P.S. Thanks for all of your work on this software! From: Simon Kelley Sent:

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] v2.83 failed to send packet: Network is unreachable

, doesn’t seem to be related to activity level…low levels of activity also generates errors. From: Lonnie Abelbeck<mailto:li...@lonnie.abelbeck.com> Sent: Thursday, January 21, 2021 6:42 PM To: dnsmasq list<mailto:dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk> Cc: Steve Hirsch<mailto:steveh

[Dnsmasq-discuss] v2.83 failed to send packet: Network is unreachable

After upgrading dnsmasq from version 2.82 to version 2.83 on Arch Linux (kernel 5.10.9), “failed to send packet: Network is unreachable” errors continually show up. However, name resolution still appears to work with v2.83. Downgrading back to v2.82, and the error messages go away. Dnsmasq