Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] dnscrypt -dnssec problems

On 05/25/2016 03:24 PM, Johnny Appleseed wrote: dig +dnssec wikipedia.org ;; Truncated, retrying in TCP mode. ; <<>> DiG 9.8.3-P1 <<>> +dnssec wikipedia.org ;; global options: +cmd ;; Got answer: ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: SERVFAIL, id: 33183 ;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0,

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Sending a fake reply to client by dnsmasq

On 06/14/2016 08:30 AM, ravin goyal wrote: Hi Sir I actually need to do it in code rather than in the conf file itself. Can you tell me that i am making changes at right function and in the right file or should i do something else? I hope you get the idea behind what i am trying to do here

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Why does dnsmasq append a local domain in DNS queries?

On 01/08/2016 07:29 AM, Mikhail Morfikov wrote: Also, though I don't see further log, I suspect that there were no requests like That's the full log. I mean, this is what happened after trying to use "ping dupaa.com". perhaps you should have used "ping dupaa.com." instead? in one of my other

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] On a 64bit system, what switches create a 32bit binary.

On 04/11/2016 11:42 PM, Rob Townley wrote: My name server runs on 32bit hardware, but all other machines are 64bit OS on 64bit hardware. egrep -R -i '386|x86|32bit' did not come back with much relevant info. dnsmasq runs on all kinds of disparate hardware, so i know it is done everyday.

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] ProxyDHCP mode is broken for serving ipxe.efi to UEFI pxe clents

On 05/08/2016 06:52 AM, Dreamcat4 wrote: But it is bad for each UEFI pc users going forwards to know to need to manually specify: pxe-skip-menu=X86-64_EFI pxe-skip-menu=BC_EFI Every time around. Because that is nearly everybody going forwards. How to solve? Can we then make the option logic

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] dnsmasq to provide public DNS service

also replied off-list... On 07/13/2016 08:21 PM, T o n g wrote: After struggled for a few days, I finally decided that I should reply, to bring some closure on this. Thank you for all these days of your tireless help. However, my conclusion is still the same as my first post -- dnsmasq is

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Static IP client question

On 08/07/2016 10:29 AM, Edward Crosby wrote: So, in the /etc/dnsmasq.conf file configure the DHCP settings to always give a specific IP address to my PC? Sort of like a reserved IP in Windows DHCP server? it is called psuedo-static because it is static handed out by dhcp based on the MAC

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Making dnsmasq make OFFER faster than virtualbox NAT DHCP

On 01/22/2017 08:02 PM, Sebastian Tarach wrote: Hello, I'm trying to make *dnsmasq* work on my Debian Virtualbox guest but I keep getting reply from my VBox host DHCP first. there should only ever be one DHCP server running on any net segments... turn off or otherwise disable all the others

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Making dnsmasq make OFFER faster than virtualbox NAT DHCP

On 01/23/2017 06:49 AM, Simon Kelley wrote: Actually, it's permitted to have more than once DHCP server, but the client is entitled to wait for some time to hear from them all, and then pick whichever one it prefers, that's interesting... i can't say that i've ever heard that before... maybe

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] DNSMASQ fails to start on boot

On 10/19/2016 12:06 AM, David Griffiths wrote: I found a discussion talking about the same problem on Ubuntu but the recommended fix did not work for me :-( https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dnsmasq/+bug/1531184 It is a case of DNSMASQ starting before the network is ready. Any

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Dnsmasq not resolving addresses for an hour

On 10/14/2016 02:52 AM, Vladislav Grishenko wrote: Hi, Albert, 1. HAVE_BROKEN_RTC should be used for, well, broken RTCs. Here, we are not dealing with broken RTC. Root issue from original mail: One of which acknowledges potential problem if the clock goes backwards... As for me it's indeed

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Windows ipv6 hostname

On 12/20/2016 07:26 PM, Markus Hartung wrote: $ cat /var/lib/misc/dnsmasq.leases 1482365715 3e:XX:XX:XX:XX:02 192.168.1.184 * 01:3e:XX:XX:XX:XX:02 1482334524 00:YY:YY:YY:YY:67 192.168.1.133 hostname * I have masked the MAC-address, MACs are only good on the local link... once through a

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Sequential IP doesn't look for unused IPs

On 12/23/2016 08:04 PM, Alec Robertson wrote: When using sequential IP, the IP allocation should start from the lowest available IP address. this depends on the implementation... some start at the bottom (lowest) and others start at the top (highest)... where they start does not really

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] [PATCH] Nack requests for unknown leases.

On 04/24/2017 05:16 AM, Alin Năstac wrote: On Sun, Apr 23, 2017 at 5:46 PM, Simon Kelley wrote: When the client sends the discovery packet, dnsmasq will notice that the requested address is in use by another client, and offer a different address instead. You did not

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Dnsmaq giving default gateway address as dns server on DHCP offer

On 08/05/2017 11:43 AM, /dev/rob0 wrote: Yes, there is an option you can use in dnsmasq.conf to change the nameserver[s] given to DHCP clients, but why do you want that? See the dnsmasq(8) manual for details. one possibility is on an AD network where all device DNS lookups go through the AD

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] [RFC] dns: add option to ban domains

On 08/08/2017 04:06 AM, Matteo Croce wrote: 2017-08-08 4:26 GMT+02:00 : On 08/07/2017 06:02 PM, Matteo Croce wrote: I propose adding an option to allow banning some domains. add `--ban-hosts' which accepts a file name which contains a list of domains to block, one per

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] [RFC] dns: add option to ban domains

On 08/07/2017 06:02 PM, Matteo Croce wrote: I propose adding an option to allow banning some domains. add `--ban-hosts' which accepts a file name which contains a list of domains to block, one per line. Domains are blocked by simply returning NXDOMAIN. is the following in dnsmasq.conf

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] [PATCH] Remove upper limit of 10, 000 for cache size

On 05/08/2018 05:16 PM, Dominik wrote: Hey Simon, removing the upper limit will not change anything except for the few users that have set this value manually to a very large number. However, if they did so they were surely not expecting that dnsmasq could just ignore their setting.

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] UPDATE - failed to create listening socket

On 05/11/2018 07:08 AM, Pan, Peter wrote: failed to create listening socket for 192.168.178.15 Cannot assign requested address FAILED to start up Failed to start dnsmasq - A lightweight DHCP and caching DNS server My dnsmasq.conf:

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] DHCPv6 with dnsmasq for automated deployments

On 06/04/2018 07:36 AM, Oliver Freyermuth wrote: Right now, I only know one could: - Stop dnsmasq. - Purge the lease from the leases-file. - Restart dnsmasq. i think the process is: rewrite the leases file as needed HUP dnsmasq but i'm not positive... if not HUB, maybe one of the other

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Disable IPv6 (AAAA) queries

On 06/26/2018 04:18 AM, Angelo Ranieri wrote: My question is about IPv6. Can i block queries? I would that only A queries is accept. which are you asking about blocking? 1. inbound LAN queries to your dnsmasq? 2. inbound WAN queries to your dnsmasq? 3. outbound queries from your

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Zone transfer fails without any error

On 08/03/2018 10:29 AM, Wojtek Swiatek wrote: Le ven. 3 août 2018 à 16:24, Simon Kelley a écrit : After you've made changes to /etc/hosts, you need to send SIGHUP to the dnsmasq process to get it to re-read the file. That  should also increment the serial. Changes to DHCP allocated

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] domain blacklist API..

On 07/30/2018 10:43 PM, al so wrote: Is there an API to blacklist certain DNS domains which should get resolved? do you mean blacklist them with NXDOMAIN even though they do exist? from dnsmasq.conf # block these domains with NXDOMAIN server=/example.com/ server=/facebook.com/

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Zone transfer fails without any error

On 08/04/2018 10:41 AM, Simon Kelley wrote: OK, I'm confused about the serial problem. I just tested here, and it works as I described. do you mean that dnsmasq only increments the serial when a SIGHUP is received *OR* it increments the serial any time it is (re)started? -- NOTE: No

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Using a variable in the address option in dnsmasq.conf

On 03/02/2018 07:46 AM, Petr Menšík wrote: and then generate your file any way you need. For example in bash echo "# Autogenerated file, do not edit by hand" > /etc/dnsmasq.d/blocked.conf for DOMAIN in 2o7.net 2mdm.net do echo "address=/$DOMAIN/$MYIP" >> /etc/dnsmasq.d/blocked.conf done

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Expand-host multiple domains?

On 10/09/2018 09:57 AM, Jarno Elonen wrote: Is it possible to expand hosts file entries against multiple domains with Dnsmasq? Or perhaps setup a DNAME-like aliasing of hosts in one domain to another domain? To clarify, if my "/etc/hosts" contained... 1.2.3.4 host1 4.5.6.7 host2 ...and my

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] DHCP, how to ignore the client MAC address?

On 1/10/19 3:26 PM, Michael Schleicher wrote: As I said, for Linux VM's, I can set a uniq Client-ID that helps, but on Windows you can not set define a Client-ID (as far as I know). isn't this the machine name? when i was supporting winwhatever, the install generated a machine name... that is

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Config Parcing Bug

On 1/11/19 7:22 PM, Tasnad Kernetzky wrote: Hi all, I wanted to report a bug (at least we belieave it is one). We had a short discussion over at the archlinux bugtracker (https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/60366). In short: echo 'address=/ab--c.example.com/#' | dnsmasq --test -C - dnsmasq:

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] DHCP tag being ignored?

On 4/6/19 1:41 PM, Dave Thompson wrote: I can see that the Windows 7 VM is requesting 104. Perhaps Dnsmasq is honouring that and ignoring the config file? i think you have to release the address, first... something so that the VM won't try to request the last address it had... if it requests

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] The order of nameservers provided by `server=`

On 3/25/19 12:14 PM, John Robson wrote: Don’t think dnsmasq cares what order they are in, it tests them all and chooses the fastest to use. then what good is "strict-order"?? -- NOTE: No off-list assistance is given without prior approval. *Please keep mailing list traffic on the

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] ubus problem

On 4/8/19 1:52 PM, Jan Willem Janssen wrote: I've to give it some thought about how we could support multiple Dnsmasq instances in combination with UBus. Not sure how the DBus implementation would handle this... is there some ID or signature that could be used to differentiate between

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] ubus problem

On 4/8/19 3:58 PM, wkitt...@gmail.com wrote: is there some ID or signature that could be used to differentiate between separate dnsmasq instances? if so, one could specify that in the config and that could be used with dbus to separate the instances and how they communicate... i mixed up

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] ubus problem

On 4/10/19 12:55 PM, Jan Willem Janssen wrote: There's one solution I can think of: making the name under which we register the UBus object configurable (with "dnsmasq" as default for backwards compatibility). It would allow multiple instances to be configured each with their own unique name.

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] dhcp-name-match ?

On 11/17/19 9:58 AM, James Feeney wrote: On 11/14/19 10:17 PM, Geert Stappers wrote: I look forward to the change proposal. Learn to read English for comprehension, and then refer back to the post you quoted. he's saying submit a patch and see what happens ;) -- NOTE: No off-list

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] how to force dnsmasq to stop ignoring nameserver it thinks is on a local interface

On 1/25/20 8:04 AM, Jonathan Knoll wrote: I run dnsmasq in a kubernetes pod with some forwarding rules that include some kubernetes service IPs (172.31.*).  In a recent kubernetes update, it seems that kubernetes configures all of those service addresses as IPVS interfaces in the pod, and I

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Struggling with multiple nameservers

On 1/7/20 2:10 PM, Harry Moyes wrote: dnsmasq very usefully reports the compiled in options with the -v flag. The pihole derivative has lost that rather useful feature, so exactly what options it has been complied with is hard to tell. personally speaking, i'd see what it would take to

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] : Dns lookup failures if one of the upstream servers are down (P Elaborate)

please quote relevant text and respond inline... please also trim irrelevant text... especially when replying to digests ;) -- NOTE: No off-list assistance is given without prior approval. *Please keep mailing list traffic on the list unless* *a signed and pre-paid contract

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] No DHCPOffer back but DHCPDiscover is being received by machine

On 4/15/20 7:18 AM, Josh H wrote: Working on ISC but not dnsmasq reinforces my diagnosis: dhcpd bypasses iptables for such packets, dnsmasq doesn't. I have no rules on either of the machines with iptables: what about nftables if you are using a recent version of linux? many seem to

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] multiple upstream servers

On 7/29/20 1:21 PM, S Irlapati wrote: dhcp-host=00:a1:b0:08:61:67,floater,tag:red,192.168.13.109 dhcp-host=00:c0:a8:be:ed:d0,Ziong,tag:green,192.168.13.110 dhcp-option=tag:red,option:dns-server,10.88.13.3 dhcp-option=tag:green,option:dns-server,10.88.13.4 server=10.88.13.4#53 The above does

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] DNS64 support

On 7/31/20 8:19 PM, Neal P. Murphy wrote: On Fri, 31 Jul 2020 15:29:06 +0200 Trey Sis wrote: may I suggest adding an option for DNS64, i.e. synthesizing of records given a specified prefix for IPv4-only hostnames? I see this has been brought up, but almost 10 years ago. With dnsmasq being

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] multiple upstream servers

On 7/29/20 7:59 PM, Dan Schaper wrote: You've told dnsmasq to send a lease with option 6 (DNS) set to 10.88.13.3. Where dnsmasq forwards the queries to is not relevant to your issue, you only have one upstream server configured. are you saying that this

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Setting multiple tags

On 8/4/20 7:15 AM, Geert Stappers wrote: Please try } --dhcp-host="02:00:ac:10:00:0a,id:*,set:foo:bar:baz,172.16.0.10,node1,infinite and report back. if this is the correct format, shouldn't the related example command line example be [,set:[::]] or similar? -- NOTE: No

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Can I tell dnsmasq not to use one isolated address in a DHCP range

On 12/26/20 8:57 AM, Chris Green wrote: Is it possible to tell dnsmasq not to use one IP address in a dhcp-range assignment? I have a user on my LAN who has set 192.168.1.121 in their system as their IP address and it's in my dhcp-range=192.168.1.80,192.168.1.223,12h not that i know of... my

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] dhcp-host precedence request due multiple matches

On 6/21/21 3:05 AM, Jesus M Diaz wrote: - *My point of view:   Each computer has a (dnsmasq) DNS entry, the entry gets in DNS by DHCP of dnsmasq*. What a computer is? the physical instance or the virtual one? the hardware or the software? This is the key to my scenario. And I totally agree

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] dhcp-host precedence request due multiple matches

On 6/21/21 8:42 AM, Jesus M Diaz wrote: so, if I have two virtual computers running over the same hardware, what should be used as identifier for dnsmasq? the physical mac-address (just one, as it is just one physical card)? the dhcp-client-id or hostname (configurable as per logical device

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] dhcp-host precedence request due multiple matches

On 6/21/21 12:09 PM, Jesus M Diaz wrote: I never talked of VM on purpose, because they are not VM (hence, no hypervisor or any other controller plane). but you did, sir... here's the quote from your original message... On 6/21/21 3:05 AM, Jesus M Diaz wrote:> Not an answer, actually. > [...]

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] "multiple MAC addresses in a single dhcp-host" vs "multiple dhcp-host lines with the same IP address"

On 5/17/21 5:30 AM, Jesus M Diaz wrote: dhcp-host=*:*:*:d0:4d:e3,set:mobile,192.168.0.217,xiaomi-a2 i have to wonder if using wildcards counts as "multiple mac addresses"... what happens if you explicitly set all four* of the possible mac addresses instead of using the asterisk wildcards?

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] OT client q: both static and dhcp

On 6/27/21 3:26 PM, Carl Karsten wrote: On Sun, Jun 27, 2021 at 2:12 PM wrote: put another NIC in it and dedicat that NIC to your management access... assign it an IP in a weird RFC1918 block and you should be ok... this way you can always access it even if the other general

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] OT client q: both static and dhcp

On 6/28/21 8:59 AM, Carl Karsten wrote: On Mon, Jun 28, 2021 at 7:07 AM wrote: because the two management NICs and crossover cable are your own and can be set so you always have access no matter what the other network is if you even have access to another network at the time...

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] OT client q: both static and dhcp

On 6/27/21 1:01 PM, Carl Karsten wrote: If I do not have access to the venue network, then my networking needs are just my 2 devices.  This is the  case I am trying to provide for, without having to edit a config file.  the Opsis PC is often headless,  so editing is done via ssh from the

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] [PATCH] Re: --server=/example/8.8.8.8 --server=/example/9.9.9.9 behaviour

On 5/4/21 4:00 PM, Petr Menšík wrote: [...] With some hierarchy, it could reduce number of entries compared. Binary tree implementation still might be better, but harder to implement well. why is that? btree libraries have been around for decades and should be easy enough to add and use... we

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Problem with domain names containing 3 or more minus in a row

On 3/8/21 3:31 AM, psycl...@web.de wrote: Therefore I use lists called "Shalla's Blacklists" that happen to have domains with multiple minus in a form like this XX.XX.1596.hk. (This is not the actual domain, since it is malicious I changed one letter to X). eWAG in progress: on first

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Noob question

On 8/30/21 6:00 PM, rrandom via Dnsmasq-discuss wrote: Thank you. Btw why dnsmasq redirects that connections but doesn't just drop them? Honestly, I don't know much about networking but simple dropping seems like easier for resources. dropping connections is outside of dnsmasq's purview...

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Option 12 hostname sent to RPi seems incorrect

On 10/21/21 7:05 AM, Shrenik Bhura wrote: DHCP Request >           Server-ID (54), length 4: 192.168.67.1 >           Requested-IP (50), length 4: 192.168.67.53 >           Hostname (12), length 13: "192.168.67.53" Client says "My hostname is '192.168.67.53'" [...]

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] dnsmasq on large scale network

On 12/5/21 1:44 PM, Fabian Druschke wrote: Does someone have experience with such a scenario, and is there a proper tool to benchmark DHCP ? perhaps something like this is what you are looking for? listed in no specific order... i've never worked with any of these...

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Option 12 hostname sent to RPi seems incorrect

On 10/27/21 12:15 PM, Geoff Back wrote: You said, earlier on: /"Nothing on the server is configured to set the same.  The Raspberry Pi client is netbooting, so nothing on the client side could be setting it."/ That's an invalid configuration.  All Linux-based systems - in fact all POSIX

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Confused about simple subdomain authoritative server (re: home network)

On 11/6/23 8:22 AM, John Klimek wrote: Here is the dnsmasq.conf I'm using.  It seems to return authoritative responses for home.mydomain.com but if I query anything else it returns REFUSED: i think no-resolv might cause that... -- NOTE: No off-list assistance is

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Having dnsmasq coexist with other dhcp server

On 10/18/23 3:58 AM, Luigi Baldoni via Dnsmasq-discuss wrote: Hello, I'm having a hard time making dnsmasq run together with kea-dhcp4-server on the same machine. Even though they listen on different interfaces, the first one prevents the other from starting. With the old isc-dhcp-server,

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] static-y IP management

On 5/16/22 5:46 PM, Carl Karsten wrote: I know of a few ways of doing this, but they all involve generating 10 lines of .conf file. I have no problem creating a little csv and writing about 10 lines of python to generate the file. But anything that involves "generate" seems clunky. I am

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] dnsmasq 2.86 seems to stop reading from one of its dns sockets after a period of time under load

On 5/13/22 3:48 PM, Simon Kelley wrote: So queries are being received, and answered, but the reply is being dropped by the kernel because the send queue is full of replies to dead hosts? If the hosts are dead, where are the queries coming from to generate these blocked replies? reading the OP

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] dnsmasq 2.86 seems to stop reading from one of its dns sockets after a period of time under load

On 5/18/22 2:57 AM, Geert Stappers via Dnsmasq-discuss wrote: On Fri, May 13, 2022 at 08:15:42PM -0400, wkitt...@gmail.com wrote: On 5/13/22 3:48 PM, Simon Kelley wrote: So queries are being received, and answered, but the reply is being dropped by the kernel because the send queue is full of

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Reserved IP Addresses for Specific DHCP Clients without a Connection to the Subnet

On 10/26/22 8:34 PM, Rich Otero via Dnsmasq-discuss wrote: In this new config, rack7-pdu1 does receive DHCP responses from dnsmasq and it gets a lease. It's just the /wrong/ lease, one from the DHCP pool, not the reserved IP address that we expect it to get. is it possible that offering

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] assigning IP addresses to secondary subnets on the same vlan via dhcp relay

On 11/20/22 11:18 AM, znu...@gmail.com wrote: As these things go, obviously after struggling with this issue for years, as soon as I inquire about it I end up finding the solution myself in the next 30 minutes. don't ya love it? The issue was me not completely understanding the

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] dhcp-lease-max is only for DHCPv4?

On 5/22/23 3:25 PM, Geert Stappers wrote: On Mon, May 22, 2023 at 07:18:49PM +0800, Linyih Teng wrote: Hello, I'm using dnsmasq2.89 and testing the maximum lease count of the DHCPv6 server with the *dhcp-lease-max* option. For the testing, I'm using below configuration: *dhcp-lease-max* =

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] dnsmasq is offering ip from different pool

On 8/9/23 10:58 AM, shashikumar Shashi wrote: 2) Put the client on vlan9. Client gets IP from vlan9 pool (e.g. 192.168.9.10) by executing “dhclient -4 eth1”. 3) Put the same client on vlan19. Client releases previously acquired IP (e.g. 192.168.9.10) by executing “dhclient -4 eth1 -r”. 4)

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] dnsmasq with Active Directory

On 11/10/23 3:57 PM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: On 10.11.23 13:41, Rick Gutierrez wrote: Hi list, A few days ago I configured dnsmasq so that my internal users would use it as the main DNS, but I have some problems, if I try to connect a PC with Windows to the active directory it cannot do