Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] VLANs and multiple IP addresses for one mac address

2014-06-27 Thread David Joslin
Ok, pulling back a level or two in the discussion tree since I'd gonethe wrong path, I have now tried the following: dhcp-range=start1,stop1... dhcp-range=tag:vlan-if,start2,stop2... dhcp-host=eth-addr,ethwlan-addr,name1,ip-in-range1 dhcp-host=eth-addr,ethwlan-addr,name2,ip-in-range2 I

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] VLANs and multiple IP addresses for one mac address

2014-06-26 Thread David Joslin
On 25 June 2014 06:24, Albert ARIBAUD albert.arib...@free.fr wrote: Hi David, Le Tue, 24 Jun 2014 23:50:54 +0100, David Joslin dav...@nkcc.org.uk a écrit : Thanks for the reply, Simon. How would I do that? I already use the --dhcp-host option to allocate IP addresses by MAC

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] VLANs and multiple IP addresses for one mac address

2014-06-26 Thread David Joslin
On 26 June 2014 12:45, Albert ARIBAUD albert.arib...@free.fr wrote: Bonjour David, ​Here's the configuration for the DHCP range used on one VLAN (on interface br1). interface=br1 dhcp-range=tag:br1,10.10.20.101,10.10.20.200,255.255.255.0,1440m

[Dnsmasq-discuss] VLANs and multiple IP addresses for one mac address

2014-06-24 Thread David Joslin
I have a wireless network split into several vlans, each with its own subnet, with dnsmasq serving all vlans. The wireless network is a Ubiquti Unifi system and the access points all have static IP addresses on the management vlan. Additionally, the access points each request IP addresses via DHCP

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] VLANs and multiple IP addresses for one mac address

2014-06-24 Thread David Joslin
=tag:br3,10.10.70.101,10.10.70.200,255.255.255.0,1440m. This works fine. But I can't see how to allocate static IP addresses based on VLAN membership. Am I missing something obvious? Cheers David On 24 June 2014 22:30, Simon Kelley si...@thekelleys.org.uk wrote: On 24/06/14 10:08, David Joslin wrote: I have a wireless

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] dnsmasq using 100% cpu on router

2014-04-29 Thread David Joslin
, Simon Kelley si...@thekelleys.org.uk wrote: Note that this bug appears to be a hard lockup. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dnsmasq/+bug/1313393 investigations are continuing. Simon. On 28/04/14 12:18, Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant wrote: On 25/04/2014 09:37, David Joslin

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] dnsmasq using 100% cpu on router

2014-04-25 Thread David Joslin
On 24 April 2014 21:13, Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant ke...@darbyshire-bryant.me.uk wrote: On 24/04/2014 20:49, Simon Kelley wrote: On 24/04/14 20:41, David Joslin wrote: Thanks for the reply, Simon. DNSSEC isn't enabled. I wonder if the pattern of the problem gives any clues... As I

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] dnsmasq using 100% cpu on router

2014-04-24 Thread David Joslin
the problem not show itself as soon as dnsmasq was restarted rather than showing the gradual increase in peak usage until it hits 100%? I hope this helps. Any thoughts on this pattern? Cheers David On 24 April 2014 12:41, Simon Kelley si...@thekelleys.org.uk wrote: On 22/04/14 20:04, David Joslin

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] dnsmasq using 100% cpu on router

2014-04-23 Thread David Joslin
The router isn't being used for wi-fi. We have a Ubiquiti Unifi wi-fi system throughout the building. The router is just routing (and providing dns, dhcp etc). David On 23 April 2014 02:43, Weedy weedy2...@gmail.com wrote: On 22 Apr 2014 15:10, David Joslin dav...@nkcc.org.uk wrote: Hi

[Dnsmasq-discuss] dnsmasq using 100% cpu on router

2014-04-22 Thread David Joslin
Hi I have an Asus rt-n16 router running the Shibby version of the Tomato firmware which includes dnsmasq version 2.69test3. It's in use in a building that frequently has 50+ users on a wireless network and dnsmasq has performed extremely well with very little load on the router. However, we've

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] DHCP errors with vlans and multiple subnets

2014-03-04 Thread David Joslin
Thanks, Simon. The access points are all on vlan 9 (the management vlan). They serve wireless clients on vlans 3, 4 and 5 but they don't have interfaces on these vlans. What's really baffling me is that nothing has changed with the network configuration. I've been through the configuration of