2010/9/10 Mark Cross markcross.gpg...@gmx.com:
[snip]
BEHAVE 64:ff9b::/96 Well Known Prefix
Oh, drafts are also OK?
Then i have this nice comment here in my code:
//TODO: add DS-Lite well known addresses
/*
* When the draft gets to standard:
* 192.0.0.0/29 is reserved for the p2p
2010/9/8 Simon Kelley si...@thekelleys.org.uk:
dnsm...@flyingout.name wrote:
[snip - IPv6 rebind filter failing]
What IPv6 ranges need to be blocked? the IPv4-mapped ones obviously, but
::1 also?
Sure, it's the equivalent to 127.0.0.1
What about the fe80:: link-local addresses.
I would say
Simon Kelley schrieb:
François-Xavier Le Bail wrote:
Hello,
[snip]
Is there current plans to support in DNSmasq a stateless DHCPv6
server ?
Not currently. Would there be any advantage to having this as part of
dnsmasq, rather than a stand-alone daemon?
1) One config.
2) Getting over
Simon Kelley schrieb:
Adding IPv6 support would be fairly simple: the DNS part of dnsmasq does
do IPv6, so all the bits are already in place, there just need to be an
IPv6 socket listening as well as an IPv4 one, and a couple of address
fields in structures need to be extended to hold IPv6
Jan 'RedBully' Seiffert schrieb:
Simon Kelley schrieb:
Adding IPv6 support would be fairly simple: the DNS part of dnsmasq does
do IPv6, so all the bits are already in place, there just need to be an
IPv6 socket listening as well as an IPv4 one, and a couple of address
fields in structures
Jan 'RedBully' Seiffert schrieb:
Jan 'RedBully' Seiffert schrieb:
Simon Kelley schrieb:
Adding IPv6 support would be fairly simple: the DNS part of dnsmasq does
do IPv6, so all the bits are already in place, there just need to be an
IPv6 socket listening as well as an IPv4 one, and a couple
Helmut Hullen schrieb:
[snip]
My first trial:
Dnsmasq version 2.52
-
dhcp-mac = set:fog, 11.22.33.44.55.66
# beliebig oft zu wiederholen
pxe-service = tag:fog,x86PC,fog,192.168.0.5
pxe-service = tag:!fog,x86PC,Arktur,192.168.0.1
#
clemens fischer schrieb:
[snip]
When testing the recent testing version with the rebind-domain-ok
option (2.53test25) I noticed that dnsmasq doesn't do iterative queries,
only recursive ones.
Yes, and that is the way it is intendet.
This means dnsmasq forwards queries to an ISP's resolver
Paul Smith schrieb:
On Mon, 2010-04-12 at 20:51 +0100, Simon Kelley wrote:
[snip]
You are seeing problems because you are running lots of hosts through
the address-aquisition process simultaneously and their MAC addresses
are all very similar because they have the same manufacturer. This is
simon stenning schrieb:
Hi
I would like to implement wildcards in the address switch, along the lines
of
[snip]
Is this possible? Is there a wildcard character to be added ie
address=/%domain%/127.0.0.1/
Besides of '#', which will match any domain, no, no wildcard character.
But are
Simon Kelley schrieb:
[snip]
I'd be rather more inclined to extend the DBus interface, which allows
dynamic setting of servers (but not source ports)
I'm still bewildered why people are so allergic to restarting dnsmasq:
it takes almost no time, doesn't disrupt existing connections and the
Perette Barella schrieb:
Was this mail also ment to go to the list?
On 2010年03月05日, at 12:16, Jan 'RedBully' Seiffert wrote:
[snip]
As far as coming up with a way to handle restarting dnsmasq without
hiccups... I tend to agree with Brad... if you need 100% uptime, a better
solution
richardvo...@gmail.com schrieb:
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 3:05 PM, Simon Kelley si...@thekelleys.org.uk wrote:
richardvo...@gmail.com wrote:
[snip]
Actually, instead of prohibiting use of tags set by tag-if for further
tag-if, I think it's more reasonable to execute the lines in order and
Simon Kelley schrieb:
Jan 'RedBully' Seiffert wrote:
I see where this will all lead to ... a tag construction tool with dnf
generation and Quine–McCluskey minimizer.
Perfect! I look forward to the patch. My non-backpropagating tag-if
evaluator took 11 lines of code. I'll give you
Simon Kelley schrieb:
Alberto's query got me thinking: If dnsmasq were to read the value of
the IP hop-count on incoming queries, and decrement it when forwarding,
loops would be squashed in the same way as IP layer-three forwarding.
Can anyone see a problem with this?
If i'm not
pulle...@web.de schrieb:
hi,
gibt es deinen patch auch für die 2.51 ?
bin kein coder
:~/dnsmasq-2.51# patch attachment-0001.bin
patching file Makefile
Hunk #1 FAILED at 27.
Hunk #2 FAILED at 36.
Hunk #3 FAILED at 56.
3 out of 3 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file Makefile.rej
Jan 'RedBully' Seiffert schrieb:
[snip]
Looks, my regex patch does not apply to 2.51, so i imported 2.51 into my VCS,
merged it and regenerated the patch.
And while at it, rediff against dnsmasq-2.52test12
Apply with:
cd dnsmasq-2.52test12
patch -p1 patchfile_name.patch
Only compile
Xavier Kerestesy wrote:
Does anyone have an idea on how I can accomplish this?
Hmmm, it is still a little confusing what you are trying to achive, but i guess
you want dnsmasq to query different DNS-Server based on the client MAC-Address.
This is AFAIK not possible.
But there are
Petri Savilahti wrote:
Hallo Helmut,
Danke schoen fuer deine Hilfe!
What if the primary link (/etc/resolv.conf) goes down? Dnsmasq will
not get any replies using nameservers from this file. Does dnsmasq
automatically read then the /etc/ppp/resolv.conf?
dnsmask reads all specified files
Peter wrote:
Apologies for digging up this thread, but its exactly my issue, and
after nearly 12 hours researching it, im jaded to the point of madness.
Same deal, theres a modem running off a pppoa dsl link (NZ), and the
modem has a pppoe - pppoa pass through feature ( Draytek Vigor series)
Adam Hardy wrote:
Jan 'RedBully' Seiffert on 11/09/08 21:17, wrote:
[snip]
Hmmm, a mtu of 1430 looks a bit strange, but propably depends on your
link.
Some kind of VPN or PPPoA on your side? Or are you saying paypal has
some kind of Tunnel/Route/Whatever which limits THEIR mtu
Adam Hardy wrote:
Steven Jan Springl on 11/09/08 15:20, wrote:
On Thursday 11 September 2008 14:08, Adam Hardy wrote:
Hi,
searched the archives and the net and was surprised not to see any hits
for MTU except its generic appearance in log statements.
I had to change my MTU on my workstations
Carlos Carvalho wrote:
Today dnsmasq died. It was the first time since I use it :-(
In its log there's no sign of problems. The last entry is for a
DHCPNAK; it's the only such record with 2.43. The kernel log says
Jul 11 14:27:38 hoggar dnsmasq[11797]: segfault at 10 ip 08061e91 sp bfffe770
Sven Köhler wrote:
here's the leases file from a currently running dnsmasq installation:
86400 00:12:f0:a1:81:7d 10.1.2.233 bert 01:00:12:f0:a1:81:7d
86400 00:12:f0:a1:81:7d 10.1.2.22 *
ff:65:74:68:31:00:01:00:01:0e:91:06:82:00:00:f0:7a:14:04
How can that be? Same MAC-addresses, but
Adam Hardy wrote:
[snip]
Yes you did say that previously but I was unsure about the requirement
of the slashes front and back, so I left it unchanged.
So I changed the dnsmasq.conf again in this way and now the logging
gives me the following:
isengard dnsmasq[8120]: reading
Adam Hardy wrote:
Thanks again for the help. Config files appended at bottom for reference.
Jan 'RedBully' Seiffert on 10/09/07 16:45, wrote:
Adam Hardy wrote:
adam@gondor:~$ cat /etc/resolv.conf
search localdomain.net
nameserver 192.168.0.2
Ok, looks good.
Is their default gateway set
mmarkk wrote:
Il giorno 13/feb/07, alle ore 10:58, Simon Kelley ha scritto:
There's no way to increase verbosity which would be useful here, since
you can build new binaries, I guess adding old-fashioned printf is the
way to debug. The code you are interested in in src/dnsmasq.c, lines
Pedro Côrte-Real wrote:
I have a VPN permanently connected between two sites. It's a routed
one, so each network has its own subnet. There's a dnsmasq server on
each side doing DNS and DHCP. The problem is that I want laptops to
have the same network name independent of which side they're in.
Simon Kelley wrote:
Jan 'RedBully' Seiffert wrote:
While it is common that most of these entries will point to one address
(be it 127.0.0.1 or a local LAN machine) and F_REVERSE not set for them,
it's a pity it will still slow down reverse lookups...
Reverse lookups currently iterate over
Jason wrote:
Hello all,
Hi
I'm considering replacing squidguard, a filtering redirector for the
squid cache proxy, with a BIG hosts file and dnsmasq (716,093
entries!). Currently, my network serves less than 10 clients(dns only,
no dhcp), but may reach 200 in the next few years. Will
30 matches
Mail list logo
