I can confirm - it should be 2.73 across the board :) On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 1:12 PM, Lonnie Abelbeck <li...@lonnie.abelbeck.com> wrote:
> > On May 15, 2015, at 2:37 PM, Simon Kelley <si...@thekelleys.org.uk> wrote: > > > Anyone running 2.67rc6 or 2.67rc7 should be aware that there's a > > remotely exploitable buffer overflow in those trees. I just tagged > > 2.67rc8, which includes the fix. > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > Simon. > > I think you meant to type 2.73rc6 ... 2.73rc7 ... 2.73rc8 > > Fix buffer overflow introduced in 2.73rc6. > > Lonnie > > > > _______________________________________________ > Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list > Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk > http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss >
_______________________________________________ Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss
