On Mon, Apr 1, 2019 at 11:55 AM Simon Kelley wrote:
>
> On 01/04/2019 16:33, Ryan Gray wrote:
> > Update on testing the new shared-network configuration: My lab
> > network is the happiest network right now. This is great.
> >
> > A few clarifications: I needed to set the source part of the
> >
On 01/04/2019 16:33, Ryan Gray wrote:
> Update on testing the new shared-network configuration: My lab
> network is the happiest network right now. This is great.
>
> A few clarifications: I needed to set the source part of the
> shared-network parameter to the IP of my relay, not the IP or
>
Update on testing the new shared-network configuration: My lab
network is the happiest network right now. This is great.
A few clarifications: I needed to set the source part of the
shared-network parameter to the IP of my relay, not the IP or
interface of my dnsmasq server. My dnsmasq server is
On 30/03/2019 18:33, Ryan Gray wrote:
> TLDR; How do I use "shared-network" exactly? :)
>
> Everything compiled and is up and running with no changes to my
> existing configs or method of execution. I'm a little unclear about
> how to hold this tool.
>
> Assuming a router interface of
TLDR; How do I use "shared-network" exactly? :)
Everything compiled and is up and running with no changes to my
existing configs or method of execution. I'm a little unclear about
how to hold this tool.
Assuming a router interface of 192.168.4.126/25 and no sub interfaces,
I typically do
Amazeballs. This is epic. Thank you.
I will absolutely be testing this over the weekend. If it works in the
lab, it's going into production next week. I'll let you know how it
goes.
Thank you very, very much.
Regards,
Ryan Gray
On Fri, Mar 29, 2019 at 4:13 PM Simon Kelley wrote:
>
> On
On 29/03/2019 20:36, Ryan Gray wrote:
> Hello other humans,
>
> First, Simon Kelly, thank you for dnsmasq.
>
> I noticed here
> http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/pipermail/dnsmasq-discuss/2018q4/012700.html
> that there was discussion of the possibility of supporting behavior like
> ISC's
Hello other humans,
First, Simon Kelly, thank you for dnsmasq.
I noticed here
http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/pipermail/dnsmasq-discuss/2018q4/012700.html
that there was discussion of the possibility of supporting behavior like
ISC's 'shared-network'. Did this go anywhere? I would absolutely use
