On Mon, Mar 18, 2024 at 04:12:44PM +, Dan Schaper via Dnsmasq-discuss wrote:
> From "Brian Haley" Date 3/18/2024 6:59:21 AM
>
> > > As an attempt to express that proposed patches get human attention.
> >
> > I'm not sure what that means...
The 'As an attempt to express that proposed
On Sun, Mar 17, 2024 at 01:09:36PM -0400, Brian Haley wrote:
> Nak.
Acknowledge
--
Silence is hard to parse
___
Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list
Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk
-- Original Message --
From "Brian Haley"
To "Geert Stappers" ;
dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk
Date 3/18/2024 6:59:21 AM
Subject Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] [PATCH] Fix potential memory leak
As an attempt to express that proposed patches get human attention
Hi,
On 3/16/24 6:07 AM, Geert Stappers wrote:
On Sat, Mar 02, 2024 at 05:03:01PM +0100, Geert Stappers wrote:
On Fri, Mar 01, 2024 at 04:43:20PM -0500, Brian Haley wrote:
When a new IPv6 address is being added to a dhcp_config
struct, if there is anything invalid regarding the prefix
it looks
Hi,
On 3/17/24 9:38 AM, Geert Stappers wrote:
From: Brian Haley
When a new IPv6 address is being added to a dhcp_config
struct, if there is anything invalid regarding the prefix
it looks like there is a potential memory leak.
ret_err_free() should be used to free it.
Signed-off-by: Brian
From: Brian Haley
When a new IPv6 address is being added to a dhcp_config
struct, if there is anything invalid regarding the prefix
it looks like there is a potential memory leak.
ret_err_free() should be used to free it.
Signed-off-by: Brian Haley
---
src/option.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1
On Sat, Mar 02, 2024 at 05:03:01PM +0100, Geert Stappers wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 01, 2024 at 04:43:20PM -0500, Brian Haley wrote:
> > When a new IPv6 address is being added to a dhcp_config
> > struct, if there is anything invalid regarding the prefix
> > it looks like there is a potential memory
On Fri, Mar 01, 2024 at 04:43:20PM -0500, Brian Haley wrote:
> When a new IPv6 address is being added to a dhcp_config
> struct, if there is anything invalid regarding the prefix
> it looks like there is a potential memory leak.
> ret_err_free() should be used to free it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Brian
