[about web server embedded in dnsmasq]
1. I don't see the need.
2. ...but if Simon think about it, I would propose libmicrohttpd
[http://www.gnu.org/s/libmicrohttpd/]
I made some tests:
1. example http server running takes 272KB RAM (free - free),
(second process didn't use any memory ;-)
2
> P.S.
> I did have an (evil?) :D thought of investigating how I could go about
> merging the two file source code within 'dnsmasq', but that will have wait
> for now (Hardly any time) :)
Given that Mongoose claims to be around 40KB (ie not entirely
featherweight), what are you hoping to gain by i
On 29/06/2011 14:21, Jon Nelson wrote:
>> LIGHTTPD: http://www.lighttpd.net/
>
> After a fair bit of trouble with lighttpd, I cannot recommend it over Apache.
> It's also not really in the "small, mostly embeddable" category.
I think the modern conclusion is that nginx is smaller, faster and
bett
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 2:18 AM, Shantanu Gadgil
wrote:
>
> - Boa/thttpd - Both small, but unmaintained for a while? - Monkeyd - very
Boa isn't unmaintained -- there just haven't been any bugs in years.
The author of thttpd also has a few much smaller httpd projects worth a look.
> LIGHTTPD:
Am 29.06.2011 09:18, schrieb Shantanu Gadgil:
>
> - Boa/thttpd - Both small, but unmaintained for a while? - Monkeyd - very
> lightweight and pretty functional. Maintained. Appears to be the modern
> ultra-micro webserver of choice? - nginx - Who would have thought it was
> actually so small...
- Boa/thttpd - Both small, but unmaintained for a while? - Monkeyd - very
lightweight and pretty functional. Maintained. Appears to be the modern
ultra-micro webserver of choice? - nginx - Who would have thought it was
actually so small... 380KB for a reasonably standard install, 260KB for a
m
On 25/05/2011 16:11, Ed W wrote:
> Now, the next question is perhaps, what is the lightest weight and most
> dependency free simply http server? For example I have a server that I
> want to add to the ntp pool and one of their requests is that any http
> request to that IP is responded to with a r
Am 25.05.2011 17:11, schrieb Ed W:
> I can think of busybox's server. Probably there are some trivial perl
> scripts (but I would want to hear they weren't exploitable...). Any
> other ideas for a trivial lightweight http server? Minimal logging, 301
> redirects and static file serving being the
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 10:11 AM, Ed W wrote:
> On 25/05/2011 14:31, richardvo...@gmail.com wrote:
>> On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 6:50 AM, Shantanu Gadgil
>> wrote:
>>> I am a fan of dnsmasq and use it a lot.
>>>
>>> The web-server idea doesn;t sound half-bad, now that PXELINUX has
>>> HTTP support (
On 25/05/2011 14:31, richardvo...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 6:50 AM, Shantanu Gadgil
> wrote:
>> I am a fan of dnsmasq and use it a lot.
>>
>> The web-server idea doesn;t sound half-bad, now that PXELINUX has
>> HTTP support (syslinux-4.10-pre14+) to load the kernel and initrd ima
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 6:50 AM, Shantanu Gadgil
wrote:
> I am a fan of dnsmasq and use it a lot.
>
> The web-server idea doesn;t sound half-bad, now that PXELINUX has
> HTTP support (syslinux-4.10-pre14+) to load the kernel and initrd images
There are already plenty of lightweight embedded web s
Sent: Wed, May 25, 2011 5:20:33 PM
Subject: [Dnsmasq-discuss] [suggestion] tiny embedded web server
I am a fan of dnsmasq and use it a lot.
The web-server idea doesn;t sound half-bad, now that PXELINUX has
HTTP support (syslinux-4.10-pre14+) to load the kernel and initrd images
This is more of
I am a fan of dnsmasq and use it a lot.
The web-server idea doesn;t sound half-bad, now that PXELINUX has
HTTP support (syslinux-4.10-pre14+) to load the kernel and initrd images
This is more of a "me too" email from me.
Maybe not immediately but soon enough ?!? :) :)
Regards,
Shantanu
Cristian Măgherușan-Stanciu wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I had this idea while trying to consolidate my PXE net-install machine
> using dnsmasq instead of ISC-DHCPD, TFTPD, and BIND, which I used before.
>
> I still had to run a web server (yeah, I know there are plenty of small
> ones), so for such use c
do like this idea, hope it gets approved!
On 1/26/2011 14:38, Cristian Măgherușan-Stanciu wrote:
Hello,
I had this idea while trying to consolidate my PXE net-install machine
using dnsmasq instead of ISC-DHCPD, TFTPD, and BIND, which I used before.
I still had to run a web server (yeah, I kn
There's no synergism between dnsmasq existing functions and an http server.
Just run a separate tiny web server. TFTP, DHCP, and DNS are all very
closely intertwined, HTTP isn't unless you're wanting to serve up printouts
of the DNS cache.
2011/1/26 Cristian Măgherușan-Stanciu
> Hello,
>
> I h
Hello,
I had this idea while trying to consolidate my PXE net-install machine using
dnsmasq instead of ISC-DHCPD, TFTPD, and BIND, which I used before.
I still had to run a web server (yeah, I know there are plenty of small
ones), so for such use cases it would be great if dnsmasq had a small web
17 matches
Mail list logo
