Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] DHCPv6 and MAC

2014-02-05 Thread Martin Babutzka
Hi Simon, Its exciting to hear that future DNSmasq versions can combine DHCPv6 with MAC adresses. We ran into the same problem with our provisioning system but I found a simple workaround which might be interesting for DNSmasq users with DHCPv6 who dont want to work with the most bleeding edge

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] DHCPv6 and MAC

2014-02-04 Thread Simon Kelley
On 29/01/14 09:53, Shai Venter wrote: Hello /Simon Kelley/ Referring to http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/pipermail/dnsmasq-discuss/2013q1/006818.html The thread mainly focuses on Operating System side of a IPv6 dhclient functions. But here are other aspects of the issue, more difficult to

[Dnsmasq-discuss] DHCPv6 and MAC

2014-01-29 Thread Shai Venter
Hello Simon Kelley Referring to http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/pipermail/dnsmasq-discuss/2013q1/006818.html The thread mainly focuses on Operating System side of a IPv6 dhclient functions. But here are other aspects of the issue, more difficult to figure out: The World of UEFI IPv6 network boot

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] DHCPv6 and MAC

2013-02-12 Thread Gene Czarcinski
On 02/11/2013 04:51 PM, Dan Williams wrote: On Mon, 2013-02-11 at 16:42 -0500, Gene Czarcinski wrote: On 02/11/2013 04:06 PM, Dan Williams wrote: Fedora 17 and 18, until 0.9.7.997, left the DUID behavior up to dhcleint, which appears to generate a default DUID itself; but the NetworkManager

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] DHCPv6 and MAC

2013-02-12 Thread Gene Czarcinski
On 02/12/2013 09:23 AM, Gene Czarcinski wrote: On 02/11/2013 04:51 PM, Dan Williams wrote: On Mon, 2013-02-11 at 16:42 -0500, Gene Czarcinski wrote: On 02/11/2013 04:06 PM, Dan Williams wrote: Fedora 17 and 18, until 0.9.7.997, left the DUID behavior up to dhcleint, which appears to generate

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] DHCPv6 and MAC

2013-02-11 Thread Gene Czarcinski
On 02/10/2013 08:57 PM, Dan Williams wrote: Best to test with is git master or the 0.9.7.995 release. Too late ... I am running 0.9.7.997 So far things are working well (no problems). I finally figured out that the easiest way to specify the duid-default so that I would be using duid-LL is

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] DHCPv6 and MAC

2013-02-11 Thread Dan Williams
On Mon, 2013-02-11 at 11:48 -0500, Gene Czarcinski wrote: On 02/10/2013 08:57 PM, Dan Williams wrote: Best to test with is git master or the 0.9.7.995 release. Too late ... I am running 0.9.7.997 I lied and I actually mean 0.9.7.997 :) So far things are working well (no problems). I

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] DHCPv6 and MAC

2013-02-11 Thread Gene Czarcinski
On 02/10/2013 09:09 PM, Dan Williams wrote: On Sat, 2013-02-09 at 11:01 -0500, Gene Czarcinski wrote: snip Unfortunately, what you have done is not going to scratch my itch! First, I would like a bit of clarification. Is the DUID-UUID going to be per system or per network interface? By per

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] DHCPv6 and MAC

2013-02-11 Thread Gene Czarcinski
On 02/11/2013 12:13 PM, Dan Williams wrote: The option you're looking for*is* to set default-duid in the lease file. That's exactly how you tell NM to use the DUID you want. Otherwise, NM will generate the DUID-UUID. See my other message. This appears to be not working. Do you want me to

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] DHCPv6 and MAC

2013-02-11 Thread Dan Williams
On Mon, 2013-02-11 at 15:34 -0500, Gene Czarcinski wrote: On 02/10/2013 09:09 PM, Dan Williams wrote: On Sat, 2013-02-09 at 11:01 -0500, Gene Czarcinski wrote: snip Unfortunately, what you have done is not going to scratch my itch! First, I would like a bit of clarification. Is the

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] DHCPv6 and MAC

2013-02-11 Thread Dan Williams
On Mon, 2013-02-11 at 15:46 -0500, Gene Czarcinski wrote: On 02/11/2013 12:13 PM, Dan Williams wrote: The option you're looking for*is* to set default-duid in the lease file. That's exactly how you tell NM to use the DUID you want. Otherwise, NM will generate the DUID-UUID. See my other

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] DHCPv6 and MAC

2013-02-11 Thread Dan Williams
On Mon, 2013-02-11 at 15:06 -0600, Dan Williams wrote: On Mon, 2013-02-11 at 15:34 -0500, Gene Czarcinski wrote: On 02/10/2013 09:09 PM, Dan Williams wrote: On Sat, 2013-02-09 at 11:01 -0500, Gene Czarcinski wrote: snip Unfortunately, what you have done is not going to scratch my itch!

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] DHCPv6 and MAC

2013-02-11 Thread Gene Czarcinski
On 02/11/2013 04:12 PM, Dan Williams wrote: See my reply to your other mail about this; I see what you're saying now, and I think we can push for having whatever generates machine-id (often systemd) pull that information from firmware/hardware rather than generating it randomly. Success! Thank

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] DHCPv6 and MAC

2013-02-11 Thread Dan Williams
On Mon, 2013-02-11 at 16:29 -0500, Gene Czarcinski wrote: On 02/11/2013 04:12 PM, Dan Williams wrote: See my reply to your other mail about this; I see what you're saying now, and I think we can push for having whatever generates machine-id (often systemd) pull that information from

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] DHCPv6 and MAC

2013-02-11 Thread Gene Czarcinski
On 02/11/2013 04:06 PM, Dan Williams wrote: Fedora 17 and 18, until 0.9.7.997, left the DUID behavior up to dhcleint, which appears to generate a default DUID itself; but the NetworkManager code will honor that existing DUID if it finds it in the interface+connection specific lease file [1]. If

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] DHCPv6 and MAC

2013-02-11 Thread Dan Williams
On Mon, 2013-02-11 at 16:42 -0500, Gene Czarcinski wrote: On 02/11/2013 04:06 PM, Dan Williams wrote: Fedora 17 and 18, until 0.9.7.997, left the DUID behavior up to dhcleint, which appears to generate a default DUID itself; but the NetworkManager code will honor that existing DUID if it

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] DHCPv6 and MAC

2013-02-11 Thread Gene Czarcinski
On 02/11/2013 04:35 PM, Dan Williams wrote: On Mon, 2013-02-11 at 16:29 -0500, Gene Czarcinski wrote: On 02/11/2013 04:12 PM, Dan Williams wrote: See my reply to your other mail about this; I see what you're saying now, and I think we can push for having whatever generates machine-id (often

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] DHCPv6 and MAC

2013-02-11 Thread Dan Williams
On Mon, 2013-02-11 at 16:53 -0500, Gene Czarcinski wrote: On 02/11/2013 04:35 PM, Dan Williams wrote: On Mon, 2013-02-11 at 16:29 -0500, Gene Czarcinski wrote: On 02/11/2013 04:12 PM, Dan Williams wrote: See my reply to your other mail about this; I see what you're saying now, and I think

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] DHCPv6 and MAC

2013-02-10 Thread Dan Williams
On Sat, 2013-02-09 at 12:02 -0500, Gene Czarcinski wrote: On 02/09/2013 11:01 AM, Gene Czarcinski wrote: I need to look at the new code in NetworkManager to see what is being done. There is a testing candidate update out for NetworkManager and networt-manager-applet (0.9.7.997) which

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] DHCPv6 and MAC

2013-02-10 Thread Dan Williams
On Sat, 2013-02-09 at 11:01 -0500, Gene Czarcinski wrote: On 02/08/2013 05:11 PM, Dan Williams wrote: On Fri, 2013-02-08 at 11:34 -0500, Gene Czarcinski wrote: On 02/08/2013 10:39 AM, Gene Czarcinski wrote: On 02/08/2013 10:17 AM, Simon Kelley wrote: On 07/02/13 21:27, Gene Czarcinski

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] DHCPv6 and MAC

2013-02-09 Thread Gene Czarcinski
On 02/08/2013 05:11 PM, Dan Williams wrote: On Fri, 2013-02-08 at 11:34 -0500, Gene Czarcinski wrote: On 02/08/2013 10:39 AM, Gene Czarcinski wrote: On 02/08/2013 10:17 AM, Simon Kelley wrote: On 07/02/13 21:27, Gene Czarcinski wrote: On 02/07/2013 04:22 PM, Gene Czarcinski wrote: I was

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] DHCPv6 and MAC

2013-02-09 Thread Gene Czarcinski
On 02/09/2013 11:01 AM, Gene Czarcinski wrote: I need to look at the new code in NetworkManager to see what is being done. There is a testing candidate update out for NetworkManager and networt-manager-applet (0.9.7.997) which addresses the bridge problem among other issues. I also updated

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] DHCPv6 and MAC

2013-02-08 Thread Simon Kelley
On 07/02/13 21:27, Gene Czarcinski wrote: On 02/07/2013 04:22 PM, Gene Czarcinski wrote: I was googling around and found this: Looks like I got it working. I must admit that I was going off of information back when IPv6 and DHCPv6 first came out. So it was my impression that in my DHCP

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] DHCPv6 and MAC

2013-02-08 Thread Gene Czarcinski
On 02/08/2013 10:17 AM, Simon Kelley wrote: On 07/02/13 21:27, Gene Czarcinski wrote: On 02/07/2013 04:22 PM, Gene Czarcinski wrote: I was googling around and found this: Looks like I got it working. I must admit that I was going off of information back when IPv6 and DHCPv6 first came out.

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] DHCPv6 and MAC

2013-02-08 Thread Gene Czarcinski
On 02/08/2013 10:39 AM, Gene Czarcinski wrote: On 02/08/2013 10:17 AM, Simon Kelley wrote: On 07/02/13 21:27, Gene Czarcinski wrote: On 02/07/2013 04:22 PM, Gene Czarcinski wrote: I was googling around and found this: Looks like I got it working. I must admit that I was going off of

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] DHCPv6 and MAC

2013-02-08 Thread Dan Williams
On Fri, 2013-02-08 at 11:34 -0500, Gene Czarcinski wrote: On 02/08/2013 10:39 AM, Gene Czarcinski wrote: On 02/08/2013 10:17 AM, Simon Kelley wrote: On 07/02/13 21:27, Gene Czarcinski wrote: On 02/07/2013 04:22 PM, Gene Czarcinski wrote: I was googling around and found this: Looks like

[Dnsmasq-discuss] DHCPv6 and MAC

2013-02-07 Thread Gene Czarcinski
I was googling around and found this: Looks like I got it working. I must admit that I was going off of information back when IPv6 and DHCPv6 first came out. So it was my impression that in my DHCP server configuration I had to use the old style of: host-identifier option dhcp6.client-id

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] DHCPv6 and MAC

2013-02-07 Thread Gene Czarcinski
On 02/07/2013 04:22 PM, Gene Czarcinski wrote: I was googling around and found this: Looks like I got it working. I must admit that I was going off of information back when IPv6 and DHCPv6 first came out. So it was my impression that in my DHCP server configuration I had to use the old