On 10/10/2023 11:25, Luci Stanescu wrote:
Hi Simon,
On 10 Oct 2023, at 00:17, Simon Kelley wrote:
I've implemented option 1 here and it's currently running and dogfood
on my home network. There are no VRF interfaces there: this is a test
mainly to check that nothing breaks. So far, so
Hi Simon,
> On 10 Oct 2023, at 00:17, Simon Kelley wrote:
>
> I've implemented option 1 here and it's currently running and dogfood on my
> home network. There are no VRF interfaces there: this is a test mainly to
> check that nothing breaks. So far, so good.
>
> The patch I used is
On 09/10/2023 11:40, Luci Stanescu wrote:
Hi Simon,
Thank you for your response and your openness to this issue! My thoughts
below, inline (and apologies for the rather long email).
On 9 Oct 2023, at 01:05, Simon Kelley wrote:
1) Even if this is a kernel bug, kernel bugs fixes take a long
Hi Simon,
Thank you for your response and your openness to this issue! My thoughts below,
inline (and apologies for the rather long email).
> On 9 Oct 2023, at 01:05, Simon Kelley wrote:
> 1) Even if this is a kernel bug, kernel bugs fixes take a long time to
> spread, so working around them
On 07/10/2023 14:02, Luci Stanescu via Dnsmasq-discuss wrote:
Hi,
I've discovered that DHCPv6 doesn't work on Linux interfaces enslaved to
a VRF. Now, I believe this to be a bug in the kernel and I've reported
it, but in case you'd like to implement a workaround in dnsmasq, this is
quite
Hi,
I've discovered that DHCPv6 doesn't work on Linux interfaces enslaved to a VRF.
Now, I believe this to be a bug in the kernel and I've reported it, but in case
you'd like to implement a workaround in dnsmasq, this is quite trivial, as I'll
explain in a bit.
The issue is that when a
