On 2021-10-10 20:43, Dominik Derigs wrote:
> On Thu, 2021-10-07 at 12:29 +0200, Tobias via Dnsmasq-discuss
> wrote:
>> it would be useful (at least for me)
>
> In general, it is a bad idea to do this but I assume you know
> this. So what is your use case for manipulating the TTL of only
>
Hey Tobias,
On Thu, 2021-10-07 at 12:29 +0200, Tobias via Dnsmasq-discuss
wrote:
> it would be useful (at least for me)
In general, it is a bad idea to do this but I assume you know
this. So what is your use case for manipulating the TTL of only
particular domains?
Best,
Dominik
On 07/10/2021 11:29, Tobias via Dnsmasq-discuss wrote:
> Hi,
>
> it would be useful (at least for me), to have a "min-cache-ttl" variant
> that's no affecting all but only very specific domains, e.g.:
>
> min-cache-ttl=/example.net/600
>
> Afaik dnsmasq treats this generally as domain suffixes
Hi,
it would be useful (at least for me), to have a "min-cache-ttl" variant
that's no affecting all but only very specific domains, e.g.:
min-cache-ttl=/example.net/600
Afaik dnsmasq treats this generally as domain suffixes for matching,
which I dislike. I think for this this in particular but
