Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Error when declaring multiple cnames to a target in a single line
On 4/17/2018 12:16 AM, Simon Kelley wrote: On 11/04/18 12:30, john doe wrote: Hi, I can no longer declare multiple cnames in a single line with the current version of Dnsmasq on Debian 9. The error I'm getting is: Apr 11 13:11:07 dnsmasq[1135]: dnsmasq: syntax check OK. Apr 11 13:11:07 dnsmasq[1138]: dnsmasq: bad TTL at line 2 of /etc/dnsmasq.d/try.conf Apr 11 13:11:07 dnsmasq[1138]: bad TTL at line 2 of /etc/dnsmasq.d/try.conf Line 2 of /etc/dnsmasq.d/try.conf resemble the following: cname=,,target Is this syntax deprecated or is it a regression? Note that this e-mail is folded by my mailer. The 2.79 release includes a fix for confusion caused by leading/trailing spaces in cname arguments. Is that what's biting you here? Yes, the fix inpplemented in 2.79 fixes what was biting me in 2.76. So to summarize; between Dnsmasq 2.76 and 2.79 only one CNAME can be used per target (--cname=,). Sorry for the noice. P.S. Thanks for bringing the list processor back from holiday! :) -- John Doe ___ Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss
Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Error when declaring multiple cnames to a target in a single line
On 11/04/18 12:30, john doe wrote: > Hi, > > I can no longer declare multiple cnames in a single line with the > current version of Dnsmasq on Debian 9. > > The error I'm getting is: > > Apr 11 13:11:07 dnsmasq[1135]: dnsmasq: syntax check OK. > Apr 11 13:11:07 dnsmasq[1138]: dnsmasq: bad TTL at line 2 of > /etc/dnsmasq.d/try.conf > Apr 11 13:11:07 dnsmasq[1138]: bad TTL at line 2 of /etc/dnsmasq.d/try.conf > > Line 2 of /etc/dnsmasq.d/try.conf resemble the following: > cname=,,target > > Is this syntax deprecated or is it a regression? > > Note that this e-mail is folded by my mailer. > The 2.79 release includes a fix for confusion caused by leading/trailing spaces in cname arguments. Is that what's biting you here? Cheers, Simon. ___ Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss
Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Error when declaring multiple cnames to a target in a single line
On 12/04/18 09:25, john doe wrote: > Hi, I'm not sure this e-mail went through the list the first time I sent > it, my appologies if it was the case. > The list processor went on a unscheduled holiday last week. Normal service should be resumed now. Cheers, Simon. ___ Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss
[Dnsmasq-discuss] Error when declaring multiple cnames to a target in a single line
Hi, I can no longer declare multiple cnames in a single line with the current version of Dnsmasq on Debian 9. The error I'm getting is: Apr 11 13:11:07 dnsmasq[1135]: dnsmasq: syntax check OK. Apr 11 13:11:07 dnsmasq[1138]: dnsmasq: bad TTL at line 2 of /etc/dnsmasq.d/try.conf Apr 11 13:11:07 dnsmasq[1138]: bad TTL at line 2 of /etc/dnsmasq.d/try.conf Line 2 of /etc/dnsmasq.d/try.conf resemble the following: cname=,,target Is this syntax deprecated or is it a regression? Note that this e-mail is folded by my mailer. -- John Doe ___ Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss
Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Error when declaring multiple cnames to a target in a single line
Hi, I'm not sure this e-mail went through the list the first time I sent it, my appologies if it was the case. On 4/11/2018 1:30 PM, john doe wrote: Hi, I can no longer declare multiple cnames in a single line with the current version of Dnsmasq on Debian 9. The error I'm getting is: Apr 11 13:11:07 dnsmasq[1135]: dnsmasq: syntax check OK. Apr 11 13:11:07 dnsmasq[1138]: dnsmasq: bad TTL at line 2 of /etc/dnsmasq.d/try.conf Apr 11 13:11:07 dnsmasq[1138]: bad TTL at line 2 of /etc/dnsmasq.d/try.conf Line 2 of /etc/dnsmasq.d/try.conf resemble the following: cname=,,target Is this syntax deprecated or is it a regression? Note that this e-mail is folded by my mailer. -- John Doe ___ Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss
