Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] How to use dnsmasq to mitigate dangers of CVE-2015-7547?

2016-02-17 Thread Ethan Rahn
Simon, Thanks for the response. I appreciate your insights on this. I understand that you may not want to go into how dnsmasq would interact with glibc, but I would like to try and understand this a bit better. I'm going to think out loud below. Please correct me if I'm horrendously off track.

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] How to use dnsmasq to mitigate dangers of CVE-2015-7547?

2016-02-17 Thread Simon Kelley
I've not looked at the discussion in detail, but as far as the dnsmasq code is concerned. 1) Reply UDP packets are truncated to edns_packet_size plus a smallish constant. 2) Malformed packets will not generally be rejected. 3) There's no limit imposed on TCP stream size, other the 2^16 bytes

[Dnsmasq-discuss] How to use dnsmasq to mitigate dangers of CVE-2015-7547?

2016-02-16 Thread Ethan Rahn
Hello, I'd like to ask about how to use dnsmasq to limit the dangers of CVE-2015-7547. This issue was discussed in these links: https://googleonlinesecurity.blogspot.com/2016/02/cve-2015-7547-glibc-getaddrinfo-stack.html https://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2016-02/msg00416.html