Hi,
although this is no longer fully related to dnsmasq, just a few sentences on
top:
> >> There's a slightly more special case for us: We have one central firewall
> (which
> >> gets the full /56 net on the upstream interface routed to it) and most
> gateways
> >> are separate nodes
> >> (i.e.
Hi,
> thanks for the elaborate reply!
No problem!
> There's a slightly more special case for us: We have one central firewall
> (which
> gets the full /56 net on the upstream interface routed to it) and most
> gateways
> are separate nodes
> (i.e. most VLANs are not connected to the central FW
Hi,
Am 12.04.20 um 20:12 schrieb Uwe Schindler:
> Hi,
>
>> thanks for the elaborate reply!
>
> No problem!
and thanks again :-).
>
>> There's a slightly more special case for us: We have one central firewall
>> (which
>> gets the full /56 net on the upstream interface routed to it) and most
Am 12.04.20 um 19:25 schrieb Simon Kelley:
> I'd split your /56 into as many /64s as you need, and set up routing as
> required (either static or using some routing daemon). Run dnsmasq
> centrally, and use DHCpv6 relays to proxy DHCPv6 requests from the
> router on each /64 network back to the cen
Hi,
thanks for the elaborate reply!
Am 12.04.20 um 19:33 schrieb Uwe Schindler:
> Hi
>
>> I have a setup in mind and wonder whether dnsmasq is the correct tool (since
>> I
>> have not found the necessary functionality in the documentation yet).
>>
>> We have a /56 IPv6 network, and plan to us
Am 12.04.20 um 19:01 schrieb Simon Kelley:
> The first question is, how static are your global addresses? Making a
> network which can survive renumbering is a lot more difficult than one
> with known and fixed addresses.
Luckily, they are completely static :-).
Cheers,
Oliver
>
>
> S
I'd split your /56 into as many /64s as you need, and set up routing as
required (either static or using some routing daemon). Run dnsmasq
centrally, and use DHCpv6 relays to proxy DHCPv6 requests from the
router on each /64 network back to the central dnsmasq instance.
Simon.
On 12/04/2020 18:2
Hi
> I have a setup in mind and wonder whether dnsmasq is the correct tool (since I
> have not found the necessary functionality in the documentation yet).
>
> We have a /56 IPv6 network, and plan to use pure DHCPv6 (no stateless
> autoconfiguration) in several /64 networks.
That's perfect. Loo
The first question is, how static are your global addresses? Making a
network which can survive renumbering is a lot more difficult than one
with known and fixed addresses.
Simon.
On 12/04/2020 17:20, Oliver Freyermuth wrote:
> Dear DNSmasqers,
>
> I have a setup in mind and wonder whether dn
Dear DNSmasqers,
I have a setup in mind and wonder whether dnsmasq is the correct tool (since I
have not found the necessary functionality in the documentation yet).
We have a /56 IPv6 network, and plan to use pure DHCPv6 (no stateless
autoconfiguration) in several /64 networks.
There are sev
10 matches
Mail list logo
