On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 07:38:37AM +0100, Oliver Rath wrote:
did somebody some speed comparison tests for the dns caching
functionality between dnsmasq and unbound (http://unbound.net/)?
Compare apples to apples. You're not doing that.
Dnsmasq is a DNS forwarder. Unbound is a DNS resolver.
Hi Rob,
thank you for the extensive clarification of the disparity between
dnsmasq and unbound. It wasnt clear to me that there are so big differences.
Tfh!
Oliver
Am 16.02.2014 15:06, schrieb /dev/rob0:
[..]
___
Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list
On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 9:06 AM, /dev/rob0 r...@gmx.co.uk wrote:
On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 07:38:37AM +0100, Oliver Rath wrote:
did somebody some speed comparison tests for the dns caching
functionality between dnsmasq and unbound (http://unbound.net/)?
Compare apples to apples. You're not
Hi list,
did somebody some speed comparison tests for the dns caching
functionality between dnsmasq and unbound (http://unbound.net/)?
Ive read that unbound is the fastest dns caching server including dnssec
support, but I could imagine, that dnsmasq has the same speed (or better).
Unbound is
