On Thu, 2014-03-27 at 20:57 +, Simon Kelley wrote:
On 26/03/14 05:12, Olivier Mauras wrote:
Yes it should definitely be TXT records. Sounds really good to me.
for upstream servers, why not having upstream.bind return total
queries forwarded + list of upstream servers that can then
On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 9:35 AM, Dave Taht dave.t...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 1:57 PM, Simon Kelley si...@thekelleys.org.uk wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 26/03/14 05:12, Olivier Mauras wrote:
Yes it should definitely be TXT records. Sounds really
Hello,
I was wondering what would be the effort, and if there'd
actually be any interest for some dnsmasq statistics improvements. (Yes
i'm splitting dicussions ^^)
For monitoring/graph purposes, actual
dnsmasq stats are a bit difficult to use and completely unusable if
using log_queries as it
On 2014-03-24 12:25, Olivier Mauras wrote:
I'd love to see a stats interface that would output total_queries,
cache_hits, cache_misses, memory used by cache, etc
What's wrong with: kill -SIGUSR1 `pidof dnsmasq`
Olaf
___
Dnsmasq-discuss
Mainly that it's barely usable with log_queries as greping log
files of 4 to 6GB tends to not be that responsive...
On 2014-03-24
13:33, Olaf Westrik wrote:
On 2014-03-24 12:25, Olivier Mauras
wrote:
I'd love to see a stats interface that would output
total_queries, cache_hits,
I would certainly like to have a standard way of getting these
statistics, through the dns, perhaps one unified with whatever bind
and unbound use (or don't use.)
Not a lot of people seem to be aware of why dns caching forwarders are
so great, although benchmarks like namebench against your
On Mon, 2014-03-24 at 21:55 +, Simon Kelley wrote:
On 24/03/14 11:25, Olivier Mauras wrote:
Hello,
I was wondering what would be the effort, and if there'd
actually be any interest for some dnsmasq statistics improvements. (Yes
i'm splitting dicussions ^^)
For
It would be very interesting to see the differences between dnsmasq
without DNSSEC, with DNSSEC and with DNSSEC and --dnssec-check-unsigned
Cheers,
Simon.
On 24/03/14 22:50, Dave Taht wrote:
On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 3:21 PM, Dave Taht dave.t...@gmail.com wrote:
I would certainly like to have
