On 23/01/14 02:31, Vladislav Grishenko wrote:
Hi Simon,
-if (ifa->ifa_flags& IFA_F_PERMANENT)
+if (!(ifa->ifa_flags& IFA_F_TEMPORARY))
IFA_F_TEMPORARY flag used only if privacy extensions are enabled in kernel,
in all other cases it makes no sense and will not be there.
That means
Hi Simon,
> > -if (ifa->ifa_flags& IFA_F_PERMANENT)
> > +if (!(ifa->ifa_flags& IFA_F_TEMPORARY))
IFA_F_TEMPORARY flag used only if privacy extensions are enabled in kernel,
in all other cases it makes no sense and will not be there.
That means condition will be always evaluated as TRUE
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 5:13 PM, Simon Kelley wrote:
> On 21/01/14 16:19, Dave Taht wrote:
>>
>> I have finally got my first-ever comcast ipv6 set of users up, and we
>> have a problem
>> with the interrelationship between addresses assigned dynamically by
>> dhcpv6-pd and other means in dnsmasq 2
Both dnsmasq in git head and odhcpd in openwrt do as close to the
right thing as possible now.
I released a version of cerowrt that worked "right" in this scenario
yesterday, specifically for comcast
subscribers, with the patch for dnsmasq (if you want to use that) but
with odhcpd support by defau
So, in this scenario, what's the appropriate configuration to allow
machines in the network served by the delegated prefix to get SLAAC
addresses and provide them with Route Advertisements?
This goes back to the question that I asked in November that got no
traction:
http://lists.thekelleys.org
Patch applied.
Cheers,
Simon.
On 21/01/14 16:19, Dave Taht wrote:
I have finally got my first-ever comcast ipv6 set of users up, and we
have a problem
with the interrelationship between addresses assigned dynamically by
dhcpv6-pd and other means in dnsmasq 2.68.
What happens now is that dhc
On 21/01/14 16:19, Dave Taht wrote:
I have finally got my first-ever comcast ipv6 set of users up, and we
have a problem
with the interrelationship between addresses assigned dynamically by
dhcpv6-pd and other means in dnsmasq 2.68.
What happens now is that dhcpv6-pd works but dnsmasq 2.68 filte
I have finally got my first-ever comcast ipv6 set of users up, and we
have a problem
with the interrelationship between addresses assigned dynamically by
dhcpv6-pd and other means in dnsmasq 2.68.
What happens now is that dhcpv6-pd works but dnsmasq 2.68 filters out the
interface
13: sw00: mtu 1
