On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 8:38 AM, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Mon, 2014-04-14 at 09:31 +0100, Simon Kelley wrote:
>> On 13/04/14 21:24, Dave Taht wrote:
>> > interesting long thread over at the fedora project this weekend:
>> >
>> > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2014-April/197755.htm
On Mon, 2014-04-14 at 09:31 +0100, Simon Kelley wrote:
> On 13/04/14 21:24, Dave Taht wrote:
> > interesting long thread over at the fedora project this weekend:
> >
> > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2014-April/197755.html
> >
>
> I'm quite a long way through it already. The ma
On 13/04/14 21:24, Dave Taht wrote:
> interesting long thread over at the fedora project this weekend:
>
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2014-April/197755.html
>
I'm quite a long way through it already. The main takehome seems to be
that captive portals are even more broken in
interesting long thread over at the fedora project this weekend:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2014-April/197755.html
-- Forwarded message --
From: Chuck Anderson
Date: Sun, Apr 13, 2014 at 10:59 AM
Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] Full blown DNSSEC by default?
To
