and rejected alternative approaches? I think
I'd learn something from hearing your comparison, if you're prepared to
share it?
Paul
-Original Message-
From: Carlos Carvalho
Sent: Saturday, March 31, 2007 8:05 AM
To: dnsmasq discussion list
Subject: [Dnsmasq-discuss] feature requests...
Since
Paul Chambers (b...@bod.org) wrote on 31 March 2007 23:03:
One of the things I value about dnsmasq is that its simplicity,
performance and small footprint.
Me too. And it already has a lot of features in spite of being so
small. That's what makes it impressive.
While dnsmasq could be extended
Carlos Carvalho wrote:
richardvo...@gmail.com (richardvo...@gmail.com) wrote on 31 March 2007 12:49:
On 3/31/07, Carlos Carvalho car...@fisica.ufpr.br wrote:
Since it seems Simon is including new features I'll ask for my two pet
ones :-)
I'd like to be able to specify separate interface
Since it seems Simon is including new features I'll ask for my two pet
ones :-)
I'd like to be able to specify separate interface lists for dns and
dhcp services. I have tens of subnets where I don't need dns, just
dhcp, and I'd like to not have a dns server in them.
The second feature is the
On 3/31/07, Carlos Carvalho car...@fisica.ufpr.br wrote:
Since it seems Simon is including new features I'll ask for my two pet
ones :-)
I'd like to be able to specify separate interface lists for dns and
dhcp services. I have tens of subnets where I don't need dns, just
dhcp, and I'd like to
