Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] following RFC6106 triggers bug in network-manager

2013-11-07 Thread Simon Kelley
The determination of these lifetimes was changed in dnsmasq-2.67 to be based on the preferred lifetime of the prefix whose local address is being advertised, which is normally the prefix with the longest preferred lifetime on the interface. That seems to me to be a more sensible metric, and s

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] following RFC6106 triggers bug in network-manager

2013-11-05 Thread Dan Williams
On Tue, 2013-11-05 at 09:21 +0100, Gui Iribarren wrote: > Hello, > so, we started suffering frequent, periodic disconnects on clients since > upgrading dnsmasq 2.62 -> 2.66 > > tracking down the issue, it came down to a network-manager bug while > maintaining the RDNSS list, where an unhandled e

[Dnsmasq-discuss] following RFC6106 triggers bug in network-manager

2013-11-05 Thread Gui Iribarren
Hello, so, we started suffering frequent, periodic disconnects on clients since upgrading dnsmasq 2.62 -> 2.66 tracking down the issue, it came down to a network-manager bug while maintaining the RDNSS list, where an unhandled expiring RDNSS lifetime results in a full reconnection problem i