The determination of these lifetimes was changed in dnsmasq-2.67 to be
based on the preferred lifetime of the prefix whose local address is
being advertised, which is normally the prefix with the longest
preferred lifetime on the interface. That seems to me to be a more
sensible metric, and s
On Tue, 2013-11-05 at 09:21 +0100, Gui Iribarren wrote:
> Hello,
> so, we started suffering frequent, periodic disconnects on clients since
> upgrading dnsmasq 2.62 -> 2.66
>
> tracking down the issue, it came down to a network-manager bug while
> maintaining the RDNSS list, where an unhandled e
Hello,
so, we started suffering frequent, periodic disconnects on clients since
upgrading dnsmasq 2.62 -> 2.66
tracking down the issue, it came down to a network-manager bug while
maintaining the RDNSS list, where an unhandled expiring RDNSS lifetime
results in a full reconnection
problem i
