Hi,
We have a use-case, where there maybe more than one subnet in a broadcast
domain and we want one DHCP server to serve directly connected clients in
these subnets.
Currently, dnsmasq requires having one IP address from each subnet
configured on DHCP server, otherwise it ignores DHCP requests
On Wed, Jul 08, 2015 at 01:26:30PM +0200, Hartmut Krafft wrote:
Hi Chris,
snip
Is it possible to somehow tell a router (the W311R+) to pass DHCP
requests on to its WAN side and then get dnsmasq to assign an IP in
the correct range for the W311R+.
From the top of my mind: Set the LANside
Hi Chris,
On July 8, 2015 12:40:19 Chris Green c...@isbd.net wrote:
I have a small[ish] home network with dnsmasq running on a Raspberry
Pi doing the standard stuff on the main subnet. I'm wondering if I
can get dnsmasq to handle DHCP and local DNS for two other subnets as
well.
I'll try and
I have a small[ish] home network with dnsmasq running on a Raspberry
Pi doing the standard stuff on the main subnet. I'm wondering if I
can get dnsmasq to handle DHCP and local DNS for two other subnets as
well.
I'll try and describe the setup:-
The 'main' router is a Draytek Vigor 2820n
On July 8, 2015 14:20:47 Chris Green c...@isbd.net wrote:
On Wed, Jul 08, 2015 at 01:26:30PM +0200, Hartmut Krafft wrote:
Hi Chris,
snip
snip
Yes, I hoped/thought this should work but it would appear not. Maybe
it's a quirk/failing of this particular wireless router (I'm only
using it
Chris Green c...@isbd.net writes:
On Wed, Jul 08, 2015 at 01:26:30PM +0200, Hartmut Krafft wrote:
Hi Chris,
snip
Is it possible to somehow tell a router (the W311R+) to pass DHCP
requests on to its WAN side and then get dnsmasq to assign an IP in
the correct range for the W311R+.
From
On Wed, Jul 08, 2015 at 02:20:23PM +0200, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
Chris Green c...@isbd.net writes:
On Wed, Jul 08, 2015 at 01:26:30PM +0200, Hartmut Krafft wrote:
Hi Chris,
snip
Is it possible to somehow tell a router (the W311R+) to pass DHCP
requests on to its WAN side
Chris Green c...@isbd.net writes:
But that would require that there's a Linux box permanently on the LAN
side of the W311R+ wouldn't it?
Yeah, it would. Or on that box itself if you can persuade it to run
openwrt :)
-Toke
___
Dnsmasq-discuss
On Wed, Jul 08, 2015 at 04:00:50PM +0200, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
Chris Green c...@isbd.net writes:
But that would require that there's a Linux box permanently on the LAN
side of the W311R+ wouldn't it?
Yeah, it would. Or on that box itself if you can persuade it to run
openwrt :)
On July 8, 2015 18:40:19 Chris Green c...@isbd.net wrote:
On Wed, Jul 08, 2015 at 04:00:50PM +0200, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
Chris Green c...@isbd.net writes:
But that would require that there's a Linux box permanently on the LAN
side of the W311R+ wouldn't it?
Yeah, it would. Or
On 21/08/13 16:34, Brian Rak wrote:
I have a layer 2 vlan (all hosts in the same broadcast domain), that has
multiple subnets active on it. For example:
interface ve 906
ip address 10.0.5.113 255.255.255.248
ip address 10.0.6.105 255.255.255.248
I have a machine with this configuration:
I have a layer 2 vlan (all hosts in the same broadcast domain), that has
multiple subnets active on it. For example:
interface ve 906
ip address 10.0.5.113 255.255.255.248
ip address 10.0.6.105 255.255.255.248
I have a machine with this configuration:
br0 inet addr:10.0.6.110
Simon Kelley si...@thekelleys.org.uk írta:
Takács Balázs wrote:
Simon Kelley si...@thekelleys.org.uk írta:
Takács Balázs wrote:
Dear all,
The relay sends all the request from 10.1.0.1 IP address. The default
subnet for clients is the 10.1.0.0. This works ok. Based on client
mac address I
Takács Balázs wrote:
Dear all,
The relay sends all the request from 10.1.0.1 IP address. The default
subnet for clients is the 10.1.0.0. This works ok. Based on client
mac address I would like to place some clients in 195.x.x.0/24
(public ip)subnet. I have set both the pools for 10.1.0.0
Dear all,
I have a setup where there are two (or more) separate subnets behind a DHCP
relay.
DHCP relay
|| |-|
10.1.0.1/16|eth1|10.0.0.0/16|Dnsmasq sever|
--|eth2|---| |
2011/3/19 Takács Balázs tak...@freemail.hu:
Dear all,
I have a setup where there are two (or more) separate subnets behind a DHCP
relay.
DHCP relay
|| |-|
10.1.0.1/16|eth1 |10.0.0.0/16|Dnsmasq sever|
16 matches
Mail list logo
