[Dnsmasq-discuss] RFE: --domain=#,x.x.x.x/y,local

Today "#" (get domain from resolv.conf) is not accepted when we use --domain=domain,network,local syntax. Thanks. ___ Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss

[Dnsmasq-discuss] blocking txt-record

I am looking into murky waters, and have no knowledge of what is under the surface. So this may need to be categorized under 'ID10T'. Can / should dnsmasq be used to block DNS TXT record retrieval? reference: "DNSMessenger" @ threatpost.com regards, Jim A.

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] blocking txt-record

OK, so a network with no mail servers (residential/SMB relying on WebMail) it may not be an issue. Is blocking TXT queries possible? I found this: "Once the initial DNS response is received by the malware, it then iterates to the next subdomain which is 'mail'. The malware uses this domain in

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Network booting with stateful IPv6 addressing

On 01/03/17 15:27, Derek Higgins wrote: > On 28 February 2017 at 18:24, Simon Kelley wrote: > > > On 28/02/17 17:10, Derek Higgins wrote: On 28 February 2017 at 16:43, Simon Kelley wrote: Could you post (or send to me) you

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] [PATCH 2/2] rev-server: reject CIDR prefixes that are not /8 /16 /24 or /32 for IPv4

Both patches applied. Cheers, Simon. On 05/03/17 10:13, Olivier Gayot wrote: > The rev-server directive only handles the following CIDR prefixes > properly: /8, /16, /24, /32. > > Any other value was silently converted to /16 which could result in > unexpected behaviour. > > This patch

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] What's the easiest way to add some names to default dnsmasq in debian/ubuntu?

Hi Chris, I think you create some file, for exaqmple /etc/NetworkManager/dnsmasq.d/hosts.conf, containing addn-hosts=/etc/hosts.dnsmasq. Then you would have to create hosts.dnsmasq with hosts(5) format. Place odin there. 1.2.3.4 odin You could use some hook to NetworkManager to use create