Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Intermittent SIGSEGV crash of dnsmasq-full

On 09/05/17 22:42, Simon Kelley wrote: Never trust a git commit which happened in the early hours :) Thanks for a second excellent bug report. This was much easier to find. Sorry for keeping you up till the wee small hours with your bug hunting outfit on :-) Guido does all the hard work

[Dnsmasq-discuss] problem with loopback and 2.77test5

here the relevant things with recent lede-project.org root@box:~ dnsmasq -v Dnsmasq version 2.77test5 Copyright (c) 2000-2016 Simon Kelley Compile time options: IPv6 GNU-getopt no-DBus no-i18n no-IDN DHCP no-DHCPv6 no-Lua TFTP no-conntrack no-ipset no-auth no-DNSSEC no-ID loop-detect inotify #

[Dnsmasq-discuss] Dnsmasq, multiple subnets/gateways and option 82

Hello, I recently built a DHCP server using Dnsmasq on Centos7 VM and had a question about having more than one subnet and gateway We are using Option82 for 15 devices on each subnet, at this time only one subnet is active but I expect that the other two subnets will need to be active in the

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Dnsmasq, multiple subnets/gateways and option 82

On 11/05/2017 01:40, Keith Lyons wrote: > Currently I have dhcp-option=3,10.192.4.1 set for the active subnet, I > will need to add 10.192.5.1 and 10.192.6.1 for the others as they come > online. I have seen some other posts about utilizing multiple nics, each > assigned to one of the subnet, is

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] problem with loopback and 2.77test5

Just committed a patch which should make this work again without needing --no-ping. I've tagged it as 2.77rc2, so please could a LEDE package be built, and this behaviour tested. Cheers, Simon. On 10/05/17 14:11, Bastian Bittorf wrote: > * Simon Kelley [10.05.2017

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] problem with loopback and 2.77test5

Yes. I'll look at putting code to suppress the ARP check. on loopback. Cheers, Simon. On 10/05/17 14:11, Bastian Bittorf wrote: > * Simon Kelley [10.05.2017 15:05]: >> I wonder if this is to do with the extension of the ping-test to more >> cases. Please could you try

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] problem with loopback and 2.77test5

* Simon Kelley [10.05.2017 15:05]: > I wonder if this is to do with the extension of the ping-test to more > cases. Please could you try adding > > no-ping > > to the config, and see if that improves things? thank you - yes, that works...now the log shows:

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] problem with loopback and 2.77test5

I wonder if this is to do with the extension of the ping-test to more cases. Please could you try adding no-ping to the config, and see if that improves things? Cheers, Simon. On 10/05/17 11:56, Bastian Bittorf wrote: > here the relevant things with recent lede-project.org > > root@box:~

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] [PATCH] Logging of dhcp_script output

Dne 10.5.2017 v 00:14 Simon Kelley napsal(a): > On 09/05/17 18:49, Petr Menšík wrote: >> Hi Simon, >> >> sorry for a delay. We concluded that we do not like die on parse error >> even for dhcp script. It does always start up now unless script returns >> nonzero exit status. With this change, it

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] problem with loopback and 2.77test5

On 10/05/17 14:11, Bastian Bittorf wrote: > * Simon Kelley [10.05.2017 15:05]: >> I wonder if this is to do with the extension of the ping-test to more >> cases. Please could you try adding >> >> no-ping >> >> to the config, and see if that improves things? > > thank you

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] [PATCH] libidn2 support

OK, answering my own question, Debian support for libidn2 seems to be rather behind, so at least for now, my life with Debian maintainer hat on is easier if the option to build with libidn is retained. I shall commit the patch forthwith. Cheers, Simon. On 09/05/17 23:12, Simon Kelley wrote: >