[Dnsmasq-discuss] dnsmasq problems under Ubuntu server 16.04

2017-05-22 Thread Paul Marwick
I've used dnsmasq as a local network DHCP/DNS server for several years, running in a small Slackware based server. After a few initial set up problems, it worked flawlessly for years. Recently I decided that I had to rebuild the server. It was running out of storage space and I was getting bor

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Announce: dnsmasq-2.77rc4

2017-05-22 Thread Matthias Andree
Am 21.05.2017 um 23:49 schrieb Simon Kelley: > rfc2131.c:839:25: warning: data argument not used by format string >>> [-Wformat-extra-args] >>>service->basename, layer); >>> ^ > Taking the patch for this reluctantly. The original code seems

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] 2.77rc5

2017-05-22 Thread Matthias Andree
Am 21.05.2017 um 23:51 schrieb Simon Kelley: > Heads up. I just pushed another release candidate. > > http://www.thekelleys.org.uk/dnsmasq/release-candidates/dnsmasq-2.77rc5.tar.gz Thanks. There is a typo in CHANGELOG which could be fixed for the release without pushing another release candidate t

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Announce: dnsmasq-2.77rc4

2017-05-22 Thread Matthias Andree
Am 21.05.2017 um 23:24 schrieb Simon Kelley: > I think my code has beaten the compiler. > > > opt->source_netmask will remain set to zero on any code path which > doesn't set addrp and inhibit the execution of the memcpy() Wasn't obvious to me, and chances are that clang either didn't check, or c

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] [PATCH] DHCPv6: Add support for more than one hardware address per IPv6 address

2017-05-22 Thread Simon Kelley
On 12/05/17 16:32, Pali Rohár wrote: > On Friday 12 May 2017 17:15:20 Simon Kelley wrote: >> There are so many layers of quotes here that I've completely lost >> track of what we were trying to achieve, and how to achieve it. My >> memory is that we'd failed to come up with any consensus on either

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] specifying dhcp options in proxy mode

2017-05-22 Thread Simon Kelley
On 12/05/17 15:35, Andriy Gapon wrote: > On 11/05/2017 14:36, Simon Kelley wrote: >> The design is that dnsmasq sends the options expected by a PXE client if >> it's acting as a proxy (because the whole proxy thing is part of the PXE >> spec: a normal DHCP client doesn't know how to deal with it.)

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] specifying dhcp options in proxy mode

2017-05-22 Thread Andriy Gapon
On 23/05/2017 01:14, Simon Kelley wrote: > To the best of my knowledge it's _only_ PXE clients which can accept > extra options from a proxy. PXE is a superset of DHCP, which includes > that functionality. The DHCP clients run by the OS are just that - DHCP > clients, they don't know how to do the