Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] segmentation fault after upgrade to 2.77

Hi! Sorry for my bad formatting (somehow it looks much better in Yahoo!Mail's editor)... I hope i do it better this time... I found a fix, but I dont fully understand it: it seems like the off_t parameter is interpreted as 4B on my Aton N270 by the called function (queue_tftp()), but as 8B long

[Dnsmasq-discuss] reproducible segmentation fault

Hi, while playing around with the "dnseval" tool from the dnsdiag package[0], I accidently crashed my dnsmasq instance that was running on my router. This router is running Dnsmasq version 2.77 on a current LEDE operating system, where similar have been reported in the past: > sending

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] reproducible segmentation fault

i found something similar:http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/pipermail/dnsmasq-discuss/2017q3/011691.html what happens, if u compile dnsmasq with -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 ? -Arne Christian Kujau schrieb am 10:34 Montag, 21.August 2017: Hi, while