I just committed a patch which does this, and some other changes to make
this work better.
Cheers,
Simon.
On 29/12/17 21:56, e9hack wrote:
> Hi,
>
> since some time, the log is flooded with messages like this:
>
> Fri Dec 29 20:53:50 2017 daemon.warn dnsmasq[20961]: reducing DNS packet size
That's old code, and pre-dates detailed git logs, but it's fairly clear
that the test is implementing this part of RFC 5107
When servicing a DHCPREQUEST message, the DHCP server would normally
look at the Server Identifier option for verification that the
address specified there is one
Do you have an interface configured with an address in fd01::/64 ?
Cheers,
Simon.
On 15/01/18 18:03, Matthew Keeler wrote:
> I setup a new vm running version 2.78 of dnsmasq.
>
> I have this in my config:
>
> enable-ra
> dhcp-range=fd01::,ra-stateless,ra-names,64,24h
>
> According to
Sounds like you're just tickling the limit. Maybe just increase it with
--dns-forward-max
Cheers,
Simon.
On 19/01/18 07:30, john doe wrote:
> Hi Simon, bottom posting.
>
> On 1/18/2018 11:16 PM, Simon Kelley wrote:
>> Use log-queries to see what's happening. You should be looking for
>>
